Because politicians have made it their mission to chip away at the NHS over decades. This doesn’t say anything about the efficacy of statutory healthcare.
Yes and no, our app is considerably larger than 130k LoC. While we’ve migrated some modules there are some parts that do a lot of multithreaded work that we probably will never migrate because they’d need to essentially be rewritten and the tradeoff isn’t really worth it for us.
Its kind of a trap, we allow people in interviews to do the same and some of them waste so much time accepting wrong LLM completions and then changing them than if they'd just written the code themselves.
The launcher UI is AppKit while the extension APIs allow third-party developers to write them in TS and a React subset. They have a custom renderer for React that turns that into AppKit primatives. So similar in concept but custom and specific to their usecase.
It might be worth going to a sports physio that specialises in runners. I did this a year ago and fixed my overstriding and increased my cadence and no longer have random soreness or troubles in hips or knees etc.
With that amount saved and invested and your expenses, aren’t you essentially able to live off that without drawing the capital down? In your position I would probably extend the time off a bit and be quite picky about the next role. Contribute to open source if you want to stay sharp while doing whatever else you like. Get fit, travel, hobbies etc.
I've been seeing this all over the internet, even on news websites that have already loaded their content. So Next doesn't allow me to read text that's already loaded in my browser because of some random JS error I don't care about.
Fiddling with a custom cloud backup solution to complement local backups instead of just using some service like I probably should. But I'm enjoying the process.
Looks nice, I'll try it out, I'm trying to slowly relaunch an iOS app with TTS features and wanted to use 11Labs but its pricing basically kills all consumer business models.
Probably but it might not matter. They don't really need to compete on quality, just the simplicity of selling a suite that's bundled together to enterprise in the same way they did with Teams which is inferior to Slack in pretty much everyway (last time I had to use it anyway). Isn't their advantage always sales and distribution? Maybe its different this time, I don't know.
Most of us get compensated to do it and the hardware either paid for or tax deductible. Whatever positions you take as a developer, there is strong end-user demand for software on iOS and to a certain extent macOS so there will continue to be people who'll do that dance.
> For SourceHut Estonia and Romania would have probably been a better choices
Doesn't the ease of incorporation get erroded by the ongoing burden of filing taxes in multiple places? I remember looking at this years ago as an alternative to a GmbH and thinking it wasn't worth it. Maybe for this type of company it is.
Serious question, have you tried to launch and sustain a consumer mobile business in the last 5 years? I have and the paid up front model is very difficult to make work. As much as users say they want to pay once, what they actually want is to pay once and receive a steady stream of features, improvements, updates for new iOS versions etc. The idea that there are no server-side expenses doesn't make a project like this static, iOS itself is a moving target for developers before you factor in user expectations from modern software.
I thought Wagenknecht had somewhat distanced herself from pro-kremlin positions she and parts of Die Linke previously held? She's still pretty staunchly anti-NATO, though. I think her German-nationalist positions kind of overlap with positions that benefit Russia like resuming gas supplies to drop energy prices and heating costs.
I think one huge issue with pairing for non programmers or junior programmers is that the LLM never pushes back on whatever you throw at it. Like it can't deconstruct and examine what that acutal problem and suggest a more robust or simplar alternative.
No it doesn’t, it tries to be smart about how it loads context that it thinks it needs to perform a task. In reality, in a large codebase I’ve found manual supplying the exact context to Aider with Anthropic’s models to work better.
This is kind of my take as well, most places I've worked at including the current place I work have more work than the team can get done. Features and fixes get cut or depriorised all the time to try release at a reasonable cadence. If the product you're selling is software then to me it makes sense that you'd not cut anyone from a software engineering team if your margins suddenly get better via LLM productivity gains. Rather you can argue to even increase a team size because increased velocity is a competitive advantage. On the other hand if you work somewhere where software is not the end product but a support function, you might be seen as a cost centre in which LLM productivity gains could be seen as a means of freezing hiring or reducing headcount.