1,492 karma · joined October 14, 2009
That consensus dietary recommendations change frequently is itself a myth.
(1) adjust energy intake and expenditure to achieve and maintain a healthy body weight; (2) eat plenty and a variety of fruits and vegetables; (3) choose whole grain foods and products; (4) choose healthy sources of protein (mostly plants; regular intake of fish and seafood; low-fat or fat-free dairy products; and if meat or poultry is desired, choose lean cuts and unprocessed forms); (5) use liquid plant oils rather than tropical oils and partially hydrogenated fats; (6) choose minimally processed foods instead of ultra-processed foods; (7) minimize the intake of beverages and foods with added sugars; (8) choose and prepare foods with little or no salt; (9) if you do not drink alcohol, do not start; if you choose to drink alcohol, limit intake
Very little of what I used on a day-to-day basis came from rote learning, a lot came from the deeper understanding that I got from actually actively engaging with the concepts.
I'm not proposing doing away with schooling completely, but the model should change (much in the way more progressive schools are doing anyway, just a shame that not many parents can afford to send their kids there).
And testing in the typical style that fails when a student can use a textbook or google makes just as little sense.
But then you only need a mini-blockchain along the lines of what IBM calls blockchain, you may have a few industry players and say a customs agency agree to sign the entries and then there will be no dispute about whether an entry was signed on a particular day. Energy cost of that is negligible. (and you don't need to put the actual transaction info into the ledger... just the signature is enough so everyone on the chain can confirm later that it wasn't modified).
All of this is also pretty ancient tech by now... IBM just basically jumped on the blockchain branding bandwagon I'd say...
To really give the right incentives to businesses probably requires some form of carbon taxes, very hard to get right but not sure we have a choice as a lifeform...
Well... it is happening the other way round, with runners wearing Nikes and painting over them to try and not annoy their other brand sponsors: https://www.businessinsider.com/nike-vaporfly-shoes-runners-...
Granted collecting say interest data based on viewing figures would be a precursor (I suppose it's likely that TikTok could figure out if a customer leaned left or right politically). But again that's not what the complaint is about.
It's also hard to ignore that TikTok's responses are at face value reasonable (such as evaluating touch patterns to identify bots... that's obviously something they have to do given the predominance of bots on social media platforms).
The additional data that TikTok tries to gather from the mobile OSs is insignificant compared to what you can get from videos that people take willingly.
Russian soldiers use VK, that doesn't stop OSINT researchers tracking them down on there.
It's not much help to "ban TikTok" while the ad networks run wild. If we're going to be worried about China I doubt it'd be too much trouble for them to place a few engineers into ad networks and exfiltrate the data from there.
It's not so easy to have a competitive marketplace for government services (though I would not be surprised if the US saw the emergence of private police forces now, for those parents who actually want police officers that have a duty to protect their kids...)
The evidence against seed oils / processed vegetable oils is not very compelling yet (here's a pretty balanced summary: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/are-vegetable-and-seed-... )
I think it is hard to untangle any potential non-linguistic aspect of these concepts from the language we use to describe and perceive them.
Currently we have the challenge that algorithms can regurgitate the language we use to discuss these concepts, and we don’t have the tools to distinguish that from how humans use those same words.
With current transformer models we can make a cogent case that there is a fundamental difference to human mental states, however I believe this will very soon get a lot more difficult once multi-modal algorithms are used in embodied forms and with continuous re-training and context databases.
Though by comparison rice gets you 2000 calories for AUD1.03, spaghetti AUD0.92, carrots AUD2.51, "pure vegetable oil" AUD0.059 so a more varied diet could be cheaper.
Actually I'd like to propose the carrot-only diet... Trying to eat 5kg of carrots a day is bound to make you lose weight, though your skin may turn orange ;)