465 karma · joined March 14, 2019
"bomb condos not murals"
Pretty flimsy, imo.
It's so infuriating that this BS would pass for some sort of Trump accolade. The country is in full-blown crisis, the likes of which we haven't seen in a century. Why should the president do anything? He let the states handle it. What a great leader!
* Doing it only now to curry favor with the groups newly in power
* Not doing it earlier because of pretty certain retribution from the group (man) who was in power.
Fair enough, in this case, but the both-sides-ism is responsible for some horrible stuff, from climate change denial to anti-vax.
It is absolutely a fallacy that you always need "both sides of a topic" to be reported / given a platform.
Any more deadly (like Ebola) it becomes incredibly scary and people likely do whatever it takes when they see people around them dropping like flies (especially in horrific ways).
Any less deadly (basically the yearly flu) and it becomes easy to ignore and just becomes part of the background process.
COVID is somewhere in between. Deadly enough that hundreds of thousands of people are dying unnecessarily. But can still feel a million miles away for so many people.
This was not a good "training pandemic".
That's completely outrageous. What could their rationale possibly be?
No he wasn't.
Indeed. With any major system (voting, healthcare, etc) if you find yourself saying "This system is completely broken", you need to understand that, no, the system is working exactly as intended.
That said, it seems they did handle it in a much classier way than Wink who really pissed people off when they moved to a subscription model. Likewise, that was a good nudge for a lot of people to move off the "easy" platform and figure out something better.
I wonder why companies don't use a boil-the-frog approach to try to avoid this "nudge". Like, if they started off by charging, say, $1 a year I'm sure everyone would stay and just go "OK". Then start increasing the price slowly until you find the sweet spot.
Like Kim Jong-un? Who wins every re-election with 100% of the vote?
> Any human interaction with a shark in its environment, shark wins.
this is straight-up wrong. Humans and sharks interact all. the. time. They're not killing machines.
I imagine you probably know that, so I'm not trying to patronize you (honestly). But this is really important.
SHARKS KILLED 4 HUMANS IN 2018. HUMANS KILLED 100 MILLION SHARKS IN 2018.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/01/28/shark-a...