1,162 karma · joined November 6, 2013
Check out what I do at https://github.com/jbergstroem.
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jbergstroem; my proof: https://keybase.io/jbergstroem/sigs/xNH99zh5DSCLJR_hrHtShFLmo8RcAbg79Hs506_5KdI ]
edit: To elaborate for people not very familiar with gentoo; it solves what a lot of the discussion in this thread seems to be about - having complete control of the dependency chain based on how you choose to build your software. Using nginx as an example, enabling mod_security would pull and build its own dependencies (which also can be limited based on its compiler options). Strip man pages? Done. Change libc library? No problem (if the packages support it).
The work that needs to be done is expanding the toolset to a point where you say "I want this in docker, plx" and anything else (dependencies disregarded) basically goes out the window. The current attempts builds upon a small set of packages for convenience then removes "safe" stuff. When time allows, I'd like to be much more aggressive in terms of what's considered safe. :edit
I'm personally also very interested in progrium's work with bundling busybox with opkg (https://github.com/progrium/busybox), but still think that docker containers should not be built from within - which why cross compiling from gentoo to create a minimal docker image is the way to go.
For me, this wouldn't then just be a receipt printer -- you could just as well have it push the "opposite" direction. It's essentially a straight tunnel to a specific business or person from its maker. "Here's your daily summary", "Sara from London just asked about shipment costs". Push notifications to phones does that too, but sans this - for the lack of a better word - bond. For the right business, it feels like a very interesting point of difference.
The forums unfortunately also deteriorated to bickering between the "you're paying for future promises" and "you payed for a working editor up to date". Why people bicker at all is beyond me, but I guess both camps has enough opinion to engage.
All in all, Sublime Text is excellent software – just as TextMate was (is, if you prefer) – before the business of "one man bands" most likely removed fun from the equation.
The argument of "do one thing well" might be 20 years old, but no one is holding progress back -- rather raising voices against doing so by aggressively removing choice from the agenda with it's current implementation.
Attitude and font choice aside, I can't help somewhat feel that one could explore better ways to funnel interest, commitment and donations to a project such as this; especially since it sparked as a result of heartbleed.
It's powerful, fast and will most likely be the base for a lot of {h,l}inting in editors/IDE's moving forward.
edit: Somehow missed that they mentioned Clang not being mature enough when starting this project.
I also really admire their licensing strategy. The entire project is open source; build it yourself or pay us to do it (then we'll throw in support as well)[2].