150 karma · joined September 2, 2008
Maybe the way around Twitter's bot policies is to use the bot as a coordination device rather than an auto-responder. How about @ing or DMing FeelBetterBot followers that person X could use a hug or helpful message?
I also recall some union workers trying to move a full rack of equipment. This was a full height rack with some DEC Alphaservers and storage arrays. Rather than pull the systems, they tried to move the rack as a whole. The whole kit and kaboodle came crashing down.
I use a program called Jettison that unmounts external disks on sleep or command. It comes in handy when you have drives hooked up via USB/thunderbolt.
- All notes go into Evernote, no matter how small
- I drive my tasks (including responding to e-mail) from Asana
- I've written some Applescripts to pipe flagged mail (and eventually meetings) from Outlook to Asana
- I'm working on some Chrome extensions to help me track time on Asana tasks and also keep me on top of what's "in flight" or what I was working on when I got interrupted. The idea is to eventually build out some reporting so that I'll be able to look back on the week and see what I've accomplished and how long I've spent on various topics
Sometimes I wonder what the software job market is like in Rochester these days.
Yes, a lot of b-school research crosses fields. I've worked with b-school profs doing work across sociology, economics, law (to a lesser degree), computer science, and mathematics. The difference between research in those fields and b-school research seems to be that the b-school profs had more of an applied bent. The b-school research was more motivated by practical business problems.
Of course, much like programs within a discipline can be radically different from university to university, I imagine there's also a range of research styles across b-schools.
There's a lot in Ken Norton's post, but it's all worth taking to heart. Now, if someone could point me to a good article on interviewing PMs...
I have a sneaking suspicion that it's not so clear. I'd love to be proven wrong, though!
I don't know, but it's something that's been on my mind.
Steel rides great. Cheap steel will weigh more than cheap aluminum, but is not that much heavier once you factor in yourself and what you carry.
The nice thing about steel is that it's repairable, rides nicely, and fails gracefully (should it fail at all).
My beef with "increment the total" comments is not that they are there, but rather that they don't help me get the big picture.
It sounds like there were two objections:
1. OMG, this site is pirating my content! 2. I didn't want people to lend to anyone, just their friends and family
Case #1 is clearly an issue of authors being misinformed or technologically unsophisticated.
Case #2 is that authors probably thought that they were buying into a particular scenario, but the technology did not actually serve that scenario. The scenario I'm guessing the second camp thought they were buying into was one where lending would actually not be widespread --- where one would have to personally know someone in order to read a book without purchasing. It didn't limit who could be lent to by forcing users to declare "friends and family". I'm guessing that authors felt that LendInk was increasing the amount of lends actually happening above what would have happened had LendInk not been present.
Note: I'm not passing judgement on LendInk. Just that I don't think many people are able to make the technical distinctions that many HN readers or readers of tech sites are able to make.
I'm surprised the AG has not come out against services like BookCrossing which allows individuals to trade physical books and works similarly to LendInk. (Maybe there was and I just didn't hear about it).
I think another reason Graffiti worked so well is that it's just plain easier to train a human to use an alphabet that's similar to their native alphabet than it is to do full blown handwriting recognition. In other words, it wasn't just that the graffiti gesture set was easier to recognize by software, but also that people could learn a gesture set that could "help" the software along.
With software, I think it's important to see the forest for the trees, so that you can make the best tree for the forest... (apologies for the tortured analogy)
That said, I think project managers can really help things flow. If you've got a process you are sticking to, a project manager can help make sure things get done when they need to. This is especially important when lots of things are happening simultaneously (lots of clients and client requests, lots of business development effort, lots of growth, technical challenges).
Likewise, I know many people who could care less what kind of car they drive so long as it is clean and runs well.
Some people care about what they use, some people don't.
- Be open to non-engineering roles, possibly to the point of actively seeking them out.
- Having and showing an interest in the industry I work in. Product managers are focused on solving customer and business problems in ways that create value and solve pain points for the customer and make money for the business.
- Developing a sense not only of the best technical solution to a problem, but also what business opportunities that solution opens up. Even when answering technical interview positions for my new job I would always back up a level and explore some other possibilities or motivations.
- Learn to communicate potentially technical information to non-technical people. By this I mean concisely expressing problems, hiding details that aren't immediately important, translating "side effects" into consequences.
- Demonstrate an ability to dig deeper into customer motivations and needs. They will often express what they want in terms of what is immediately visible. Sometimes you have to dig deeper so that you can come up with a design that solves their real underlying problem.
It should be fine for a developer (or musician, or other creator of content) to charge for their wares. If the app being available really is valueless or if the prospective customer doesn't believe it's worth what's being asked, they are free to move along and select a different product or to develop their own. I'm not sure why this concept is so looked down upon.
I did get one for use at work, though, and love it. I like it because it's a good combination of tactile and still quiet. Mine has variable weighting on the keys, which is a mixed bag. I guess some of my fingers are stronger than they otherwise would be - I find myself bottoming out keys with my left pinkie occasionally.