515 karma · joined December 10, 2010
YC Badge: 0x9F755062601B9bBA3354c090e11A13a508d7CA0e
It is a fundamental paradigm shift - saying that the web should be structured around people. I like it. (and working on it ;))
It is albeit, a little hard to differentiate days.
It's really honestly all about teamwork - not some tit-for-tat, we are better than you. So don't perpetuate it.
The 3 MAJOR problems are: 1. The company is sending a signal that says, "we don't trust you", "we don't think you can do valuable work", "and we don't value you enough to pay you" 2. The company gets lower skilled people, because the good ones get the jobs with good experience AND pay 3. Have you EVER tried to get a volunteer to do anything?! It's impossible. Incentives are not aligned.
But still sad that Diaspora might close their doors. They can take pride in the fact that their vision is being adopted.
No wonder they wanted to buy Path!!
interesting how the really basic info page still seems to be the most valuable aspect
First of all–why do Facebook and Google care so much to canvas the web with little buttons to encourage users to share content? In fact–why do they care if users share content at all? Are they really that loving of the human race that they are doing so solely for our benefit? Of course not.
A little background:
- Facebook and Google know an inordinate amount of data about you - they track, store, and interpret every move you make through their services with the goal of figuring out who you are, mainly to sell to you.
- But this wasn't enough, so Facebook introduced the Like button and Google +1. Now Facebook and Google can track your every move on the web - regardless of whether you interact with the button. Companies claim they delete this data, but only after they fully interpret it or extrapolate it into descriptive data.
- The problem that Facebook and Google still face however - is that they collect massive amounts of data–but have a heck of a time monetizing it–because they essentially spied to get it in the first place. So what is the solution? Well, if the user actively shares the content–especially in a public realm but also privately, that user has consciously connected themselves to that content and monetization becomes easy. (This is why Gmail ads are creepy, but discounts from Foursquare checkins are welcome)
more analysis here: http://knowit.posterous.com/google-a-reaction
'“... enhancing digital media experiences by fueling connections with relevance and interest.”' - Connection between relevance and interest? Isn't that like saying the connection between apples and .. apples?
'Specific Media is an innovative global interactive media company that enables advertisers to connect with consumers in meaningful [unwanted], impactful [in your face] and relevant [creepy] ways.' [added]
The problem with so many online services is that they ASSUME by default that the value is only in the social elements, and fundamentally that people only have valuable interactions when they are social creatures. That is certainly majorly faulted.
"Went to Full Frame Festival? Up late again with Haskell? Looking for your Shangri-La? We want you! Homebrewed beer, 24/7 hacker house, and the great night life of Durham, NC. jobs@knowitapp.com"
shoot me an email, jeff at knowitapp.com. Full disclosure, we want your british chocolates.
ps - this is broken... http://snappishproductions.com/archives.html
Knowit - http://www.knowitapp.com Use Knowit to Share your Wealth of Knowledge with the World.
Knowit is looking for fun hackers and interaction designers local to RTP to join our small and smart team. Email jeff@knowitapp.com