How about the others? web2py is too old, Werkzeug has a funny accent, and Flask is not 18 yet.
706 karma · joined February 17, 2009
Company: http://bizspeaking.com/
AngelList: http://angel.co/bizspeaking
Email: jerryj@bizspeaking.com
Blog: http://jerryji.com/
Twitter: @jerryji
Bizspeaking: http://bizspeaking.com/u/jerryji
How about the others? web2py is too old, Werkzeug has a funny accent, and Flask is not 18 yet.
"You understand and consent that you will be bidding against our robots, whose sole job is to take your money and waste your time."
* It offers way fewer functionalities than does Solr
* There is nothing wrong with Solr, just that someone wants to try something new that fits his/her needs
And the shameless plug goes to...
[1] http://www.amazon.com/Venture-Deals-Smarter-Lawyer-Capitalis...
BTW, a quick hard disk benchmark test shows that my Linode is almost twice as fast as my SliceHost.
It implies that the developers at Kayak.com are forced to do something outside of their responsibility -- it certainly would sound stupid to say "XYZ.com Makes Developers Do Proper Coding", however, both practice lead to the same outcome -- better product.
It simply shows that the demand overwhelms the supply of people who are both willing and capable of doing the job.
Plus, why wasn't the original title "IQ and the Wealth of Nations" preserved over a much less representing while much more link-baiting one "China has a higher average IQ than the USA"?
"""you should always raise more than you think you need to get to the next milestone""" -- that I fully agree too
From the top: government blessing, (biased) censorship
From the bottom: much more native friendly domain name, thirst of pirated music, nationalism, ignorance
From the corporate itself: ferocious marketing and sales -- not everyone realizes that THE most effective way of doing business in China is to hire as many marketing and sales people as the number of the bullets Arnold Schwarzenegger shoots, and I can assure you that it'll be much more effective than his shooting/acting.
If A does excellent documentation, give him your toughest nut to crack as the whole team can learn and progress from his contribution even after he is gone.
Otherwise, go for B.
The worst can happen is to hire A, and when he leaves, B has to maintain A's code with no documentation.
Hence, I believe things like security, reliability, or even a better browser will be more welcome by the business users (and the procurement decision makers!) than will some consumer eye candy like a camera.
I particularly agree with getting into the emerging markets, such as that of China and India, even though the business there might not have a keen interest (let alone purchasing power) in RIM's products at the present. Quoting Charles Geschke (co-founder of Adobe) in Founders at Work -- "shoot where the duck is going to be, not where the duck is".
Now I turn to HN readers for truth wisdom -- would the future of the US/global high tech industry really be so adversely affected as the original article tries to imply?