jevgeni

No it's not. Different types of money is common terminology. Also, no idea how "Economics has never really come to grips with the banking system" - there's enough research and understanding on this.

... in a planned economy.

Has the SWIFT payment system devolved into a totalitarian dystopia?

What you are experiencing is the post-2000 tech world metastasising into enterprise. But now in Corporate Memphis.

That's pretty good writing from the author. Don't advice people about things you might not be sure about.

Are we in a rhetorical question competition? :)

Exactly.

You're right, the difference is even more stark.

> that somehow relativity and the 2 bombs couldn't have happened without each other I found that quite bizarre..

Sounds about right, because that's literally not what I said.

One of the more egregious examples: https://www.wired.com/2011/03/aleynikov-sentencing/

No. Read up on central bank governance.

Of course you can, even if somebody else does it. Case in point: any penal code.

Basically, any modicum of security people got by installing dashcams and home security cameras is gone. thanks.

Most crypto is controlled by a few key players with even less oversight and accountability than the governments.

Which are blocked from pulling from Github?

There is ZERO credibility that this development will be used to "create a countermeasure", especially mrdeepfakes is a key communication channel there.

As GeorgeMD pointed out, there's some required reading.

Yeah, theory of relativity and tech with use cases mostly in porn and fraud aren't really the same thing.

This is misguided neutrality, I think. At some point even HN would need to pick a side.

Very well put! Thank you.

Exactly.

P.S. Also Russia, which is not really Europe.

How many really good writers not from colonialist regimes are there? How often do they make to the front page of HN?

Please don't quote Snowden as some authority on privacy

> No suggestion that any evidence was used in making that conclusion.

You'll find the suggested evidence at the end of the article.

Maybe give them hard problems to solve? My bet is that they are looking for recognition or excitement, or both.

Yes, let's focus on the *positive* returns of Enron, you guys.

why would demand be related to supply and demand? hmm...

if it has a price, it has value.

That's great advice for anyone not directly affected /s

Counting pitchforks doesn't make the pitchforks objective.