And, yeah, my guest WiFi password is kind of secret, but I routinely give it out to people who I only casually trust.
201 karma · joined August 22, 2016
And, yeah, my guest WiFi password is kind of secret, but I routinely give it out to people who I only casually trust.
Another interesting tidbit that plays into this...the syntax coloring is programmatically derived from the documentation (yet another consequence of the documentation being the specification). This wasn't mentioned in the meeting because most or all of the participants already knew this, but it's an important part of the subtext of the discussion.
Speaking as an insider who wasn't present at that particular meeting, but has been present in some other live-streamed meetings.
They drove away many of their best software developers, forming competitive software companies such as Activision and Imagic, and then spent resources trying and failing to sue them out of existence. Also departing were hardware folks like Jay Miner and Joe Decuir, who would be major contributors to the Amiga, an opportunity that Atari would later have in their hands and throw away. They completely muffed the next-gen console release with the Atari 5200, which was basically nothing more than a repackaged Atari home computer (already 3 years old at the time of the 5200's release), crippled by a terrible analog joystick that didn't self-center and was prone to breaking. They rushed VCS games to market assuming they would print money regardless of quality issues. After 9 months of raking in over $300m in profits in 1982, they ineptly handled the warning signs of Christmas 1982, leading to over half a billion in losses in 1983.
There was no way the crash of 1983 wasn't going to hurt Atari, but IMO a company which had been better run could have survived. As it was, without somebody that had Tramiel's level of discipline at the helm, Atari probably would have died in 84 or 85.
Also, the overlapping rectangles example has an error in the explanation. It says "If any of above four conditions is not true then two rectangles are overlapping with each other, as in following diagram first condition is violated, hence rectangle A intersects rectangle B." This somewhat nonsensical statement refers to a diagram that's not there, but furthermore, incorrectly indicates that the rectangles overlap if "any of [the] conditions is not true", when in fact all of them must be false. The code is correct on this point, but the explanation is wrong.
I remember when I first visited HN, after an initial bit of confusion, I realized two important things. First, there was no stream to follow...no need to feel like I had to "catch up". Second, I could scan 30 posts in the same time it took me to scan maybe 6 /. posts. The presentation was just so much more clean and efficient.
After about a week, I noticed a third really important thing. For the first time in ages, I felt like I was actually finding out about tech news as it happened instead of being days-to-weeks behind the leading edge. I was spending the same time/effort on HN that I had on /. (and mostly just staying in the top 60 posts), but getting much more for it.
That having been said, HN ain't perfect. Probably my biggest annoyance is the prevalence of links to paywalled and/or adblocker-hostile sites. But as far as news selection, I dumped /. just days after coming here and I've never looked back.
https://www.theatlantic.com/author/alana-semuels/
Of these eleven articles, ten of them run against Amazon, its business model, or its affects on society either directly in the headline or in the tagline listed on her author page...the only one I could find that didn't was "Free Shipping Isn't Hurting Amazon" piece.
So, as a person who had written a bunch of articles in the last 7 months criticizing Amazon, did that color her expectations of her Amazon Flex experience? It seems pretty clear she took the job so that she could write the piece, even basically admitting at one point that she was carrying around her reporter's notebook while on at least one of her Flex runs.
I doubt she made any false statements, but along with the objective statements, she included quite a number of subjective ones which clearly supported a thesis of "Amazon ruthlessly exploits the gig economy". And a significant portion of the article was dedicated to her own "tech support" issues...none of which seemed to be supported by quoted observations from the people she interviewed.
I don't doubt that there are valid problems and criticisms of Amazon Flex. I just don't know how much I can trust this article to objectively communicate them.
https://forum.dlang.org/group/c++.announce
I can't find anything about what changed between 8.52 and 8.57. But in 8.52, there wasn't even support for C++03, which the DMC site self-reports:
https://digitalmars.com/ctg/CPP0x-Language-Implementation.ht...
cppreference maintains a compiler support grid for features in the C++11 and later standards, which includes DMC 8.52 and mentions a small number of supported features.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support
Here's a post on the DMC forum from 2015 which seems to agree that C++11 support is generally not there.
https://forum.dlang.org/thread/dbmsmttdbpfjsuhrhpkd@forum.dl...
Long story short, this is literally the only console cart I've ever returned (on the 2600 or any later system) due to being dissatisfied with its contents. It was an remarkable achievement on the system, but for a kid who just wanted to be able to do some nontrivial BASIC programming, it was nothing but disappointment.
CW had a pretty nice environment to develop in compared to its contemporary competitors, but it just didn't have a solid compiler.
I just have to know that you can write decent code. I don't want to waste my time or yours if your code in the language we need is not up to a minimum standard. When I have to train a new candidate on a million line code base, I cannot afford to spend time also training them to be competent in the native language of that code base.
This is not about "coding passion" or notches on some Github post...this is about whether you can do the job. Although one advantage to a Github profile is I can look at your repos and see whether you understand the basics of using git as well (yet another requirement of the position).
I, for one, think your 15 hours was well-invested.
I spotted something like half a dozen failures in various systems I interact with which I strongly suspected, based upon the timing, were likely Y2K problems that slipped through testing. For example, I received duplicate bills for one of my credit cards for the January 2000 billing period, and then a subsequent apology for the duplicate bills. They never said Y2K, but the timing was very suggestive.
It's pretty much exactly what I expected from most companies...the big stuff had been largely been dealt with, but a few things slipped through which they could dismiss with some hand-waving. The thing that surprised me was that there didn't really seem to be any high profile disasters (like a company that couldn't ship products, an airline that couldn't issue tickets, or whatever) at all...I figured there'd be at least a couple.
On bash, it's M-C-e where the Escape key can serve as the "M" portion. Also, M-r to clear the command-line, which I could also have used many times. Bash docs: https://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/html_node/Miscellan...