$ openssl passwd -salt z1 -crypt wumpus1
z1sH85tcwYkQg
203 karma · joined November 10, 2011
$ openssl passwd -salt z1 -crypt wumpus1
z1sH85tcwYkQg
Must be one heck of a school district. :)
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/113/the-story-of-sc...
Fickle much? I should value your opinion about technology, because...?
I can say without question that overly evangelical religious people leave me alone about my non-religiousness FAR more than atheists leave me alone about my non-atheistness. Which, for the latter, is "almost never".
If you're an atheist, I don't care. Nor do I care if you're strictly religious. But it seems to me that atheists try so very hard to prove their superiority by nature of being atheist that they sound like they're more blindly following dogma than the most evangelical people out there.
Edit: Ha, my memory isn't terrible: 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme Indy Pace Car
What worries me is that once these boundaries are crossed for one very important reason, the precedent can become justification for crossing them for other less universally-acknowledged reasons.
If Google knows the content of this guy's email account based on hashes of attachments, that means they have hashes for ALL of the images in his account, and only flagged the ones that were on the list for child porn content. But I'm pretty sure the ability to identify all other content in his account by hash is laughably easy. In order to know what content isn't kosher, you have to be able to tell what content IS.
Say someone has pirated digital content in their account - an archived movie or mp3 or something. What would stop Google from coughing up the email addresses of everyone that had that particular attachment in their account in response to some zillion-dollar lawsuit by the entertainment industry?
And if your immediate response would be "but they wouldn't do that", why would you think not? Short of the morals or ethics of the human beings at the switch, what would stop them? The technology is there, and obviously working, why not use it to further advantage?
I sympathize with your son's situation, but starting out with "Apple involved." just makes me think your initial interest is seeing how much you could sue Apple for because some developer released a clone of your son's game. App cloning happens all the time. It sucks, but it's no more Apple's responsibility than it is that the city didn't stop the car thief from driving off with your car.
The developer is apparently UK based, so if there's any way you think they could have seen your son's game and cloned it in a month, you're free to complain to Apple and see if they'll pull the game, but beyond that I don't think they have any responsibility to help you at all.
I'm sorry for your son's rapid experience to learn that there are people out there who clone apps to make money off of someone's work. He should go have lunch with Dong Nguyen and Gabrielle Cirulli, they'll have something to chat about.
BTW, if you're on the "lawyer up" warpath, don't forget Google too for another fat purse to poke at. No Brakes is in the Play store as well.
NYPA.
...why no, the lack of caffiene in my day hasn't affected my usual cheerful mental attitude today. Why do you ask?