This whole system is so fucked.
299 karma · joined March 28, 2011
levinger.net/josh twitter.com/jlev bsky.app/profile/josh.levinger.net
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/jlev; my proof: https://keybase.io/jlev/sigs/eD75BnFfboANyGDZB-KwxBAem9Q8gO5cJo44eLj66sc ]
jlev.at.hn
This whole system is so fucked.
What happened to the states being policy laboratories? I thought Republicans were for local control? Or is that only for school textbooks and baking wedding cakes.
Or make it open source?
I did similar work with Hello.Vote for voter registration, and there are so many offline forms that could be improved with a bit of web/messaging UI. Also see snapfresh.org for a CfA project that helps find places that accept EBT cards.
I did a vote swap in 2004 using a similar system. I voted for the Badnarik (L) in MA, and someone in MO voted for Kerry (D). We did talk on the phone beforehand, to get a sense of each other's politics, and I did what I promised. No guarantees that he did, and Kerry ended up losing MO pretty hard anyways.
I've worked on voter registration tech for the last four years, in the US and in new democracies like Libya. I think SMS is the best way to reach people who don't necessarily have a home computer and printer or a smartphone.
Directly submits to states in CA, MA, VA, IL, GA, CO, AZ. Working on further integrations in PA (where there's an API), and other states with online systems that don't have CAPTCHAs. We'd love to work with other voter registration innovators like Vote.org, VotePlz, NovemberApp, TurboVote and Rock the Vote to improve online voter registration for everyone.
Will be open source after the election. Code is Node.js, Python and Jekyll.
Marty looks great, backed. Looking forward to playing robots in 2017!
https://cosmowenman.wordpress.com/category/3d-scanning/ http://www.thingiverse.com/CosmoWenman/designs/
At least we're finally getting open bill status data as XML, without having to rely on GovTrack scraping the Federal Register.
If you want a real challenge in il8n, try ensuring that all the ligatures are correct in generated PDFs.
For a current example, contrast the products created to solve the problems of 25 year olds with too much money (https://medium.com/matter/the-shut-in-economy-ec3ec1294816), and those for people who have experienced the horrible scale of mass incarceration (http://techcrunch.com/2015/03/24/pigeon-ly/). Both tap potentially huge markets, but posit very different worlds.
Getting outside of your own experiential bubble can make you a stronger product designer and user advocate, and potentially a more successful startup founder.
What defenses do we have to ensure our systems are secure and clean?
Participatory citizen-science FTW!
Buy a kit for < $100: http://store.publiclab.org/products/balloon-mapping-kit
MIT may not be culpable in his suicide, but they sure don't come out of this looking good. They maintained strict neutrality, when they could have stood up for open access.
Their behavior makes me ashamed to be an alum of my school.
1) Single issue organizations are quick to grow but hard to sustain. Once the first fight is over, how do you take your list and pivot to a new issue? People lose interest quickly unless there's a hook to keep them involved.
2) Petitions may seem silly, and many of them are, but some have actually had big successes. These are due more to the strategy behind them than the actual numbers; you have to find the right leverage point in the political process to make the numbers matter. They are also useful as signals to organizers that people are interested in an issue, even if they won't be successfully delivered.
3) Gamification in this space is hard. You're one step away from the "slacktivism" critique, and sliding ever closer with each point or badge you give out. For some examples of this being done well, see http://repurpose.workersvoice.org/
For the "3 actions you must take", the handwritten letter is probably the most impactful. Staffers tend to weight online signatures, phone calls, letters, and in person visits by increasing orders of magnitude of importance. Getting 100,000 signatures is now "worth" less than 1,000 letters, particularly as petition numbers continually increase.