4,795 karma · joined November 24, 2008
Social vote counters are just sentiment thermometers.
-- Me (-4, flagged)
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21539167
It was a marketing campaign. “We’re super cool. We’re super advanced. We hope don’t make the terminator! wink wink” “Oh no! GPT-2 is too dangerous! We better not release it! Oh wait. We did. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ “)
It was never a serious thing. Sure here and in the depths of weirdo forums people whispered about the AGI that can’t be named — Roko’s Basilisk. It was just comically stupid. Pascal’s Wager with extra steps.
Now OpenAI has tons of money and everyone wants to deal with them, so they don’t need that hype machine. Instead they’re saying stick their “dangerous” models in your toaster Maximum Overdrive style.
It was transparent
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/expedia-cto-senior-engineerin...
There’s a reason why fair and respectable people in power are called out as a rarity.
I haven’t seen that movie a lot, but that scene (and really the entire movie) has been seared into my consciousness for 30 years. It was just the exact thing I wanted at that point in my life.
It's a spam problem, only worse, because they're actively paying the spammers.
Even Spotify has this problem. All too often I'm getting recommended crappy remixes "slowed and reverbed" or "sped up". Just recently I got some guy's crappy techno with the artist field spammed with completely unrelated bands I follow. Of course, when I tried to report this, Spotify only cared if the guy was selling bootleg merchandise.
The whole thing made me click, "hide artist" and "hide song" for the very first time.
TBF though, you could always just set up a mesh network. Wait. Does mesh network functionality still exist?
I'm so glad someone remembers how software is supposed to work.
Thanks.
If you have a telephone on your desk, it is illegal for your employer to secretly listen into those calls. However, if you send an email, you employer has every right to secretly read them.
The only difference is, emails don’t exist in the 30s, but telephones did.
Let’s be honest here. Climate change was a completely predicable problem with known causes causes and solutions. It was detected early and alarms were raised in a timely manner. Literally nothing happened. In fact, even today, nothing happens. Why? Money. Because the billionaires would rather have us all die than not buy a tenth superyacht. (NB: Go Team Orca!)
The problem was not, and is not, science. It’s money and who has it. Now those same folks and their apologists promote quite laughable ideas like carbon capture and geoengineering. Could we have gotten cheaper lithium batteries earlier with more investment? Probably, but what did we get instead? Fracking. Literally the opposite of what was needed.
Science is not magic. Even if it was, the nature of the problem means it gets exponentially more difficult every day that passes. You mange to repeal the second law of thermodynamics and somehow got the carbon pollution industry to spend enough money to make it viable? Great! Oh, oops! The permafrost melted and now 10x more powerful methane has been released, so… yeah. Too late!
It’s just Pollyanna talk that actively harmful as it not only directs resources from mitigation and migration to wasteful handouts while simultaneously giving cover for just staying the course.
But hey. Maybe I’m just a doomer, and those Titanic passengers should have just sciences up more lifeboats instead of drown. Maybe all of this just… “needs more study”.
Full stop.
They’re convenient sure, but they’re also restrictive and all too often just a protection racket via subscriptions.
Sorry, but that’s just how it is.
This is literally how everyone finds anyone on Facebook and every other social network.
Also, I would have liked some Sun swag from Columbia.
I also explicitly said it would be “weird” for them share information, so you concluding that that I think collusion is the result is unwarranted. Perhaps you should work on your reading skills instead of injecting your assumptions.
I use the same email address on both accounts, but it seems weird that TT would export its follow graph to YT for any reason.
To be completely clear here. When you say, “ accept this will lead to wealth inequality but maybe a benevolent billionaire class will be more likely to 'fix' society more than our 'elected' representatives can.” You’re advocating for authoritarian oligarchy.
Fuck. That. Shit. Fuck that in whatever they find the least desirable.
Edit: Jesus. I really the above comment. It’s not even internally consistent logic. It’s just dumb.
Not only do you have to have the technology to do any of these these things (which is not a given), but somehow you have to have a civilization dedicated to doing it over the course of thousands of years.
No. Just no. It’s just fantasy.
Case in point: We know there are no type 3 civilizations anywhere in the observable universe. V