jonny_eh

I think it's fair to say though that if your results may vary, and be wrong, then they're not reliable enough for many use-cases. I'd have to see his full argument though to see if that's what he was claiming. I'm just trying to be charitable here.

Can you be specific?

It's only the largest streaming platform. I think people just take it for granted. Like indoor plumbing.

Also YouTube has been somewhat profitable.

Hear me out: TypeScript

I saw someone recommend the JS rebrand years ago, so I just started using it. Everyone knows what I mean when I mention "JS", I never have to explain.

It's good that Oracle doesn't own the trademark to SQL.

Fun idea, but TikTok works because you don't need to leave the feed. Try to find a way to provide the wiki's content in the feed itself.

I cannot believe so many morons voted for this corruption.

Who will even know?

Why not 100%?

I don't see it in the law. [0]

If you mean section 2.1.a.2.a, it just allows the president to add additional apps to the ban list, not to lift TikTok, which is "hardcoded" into the law.

[0] https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521...

China banned Youtube in 2009. What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

Looks fun, but all the special effects seem like they'd be hard to remember. I wonder if there's a simpler variation that requires fewer rules to remember.

> Btw, the name is probably temporary

It's announced, and the name is fine, so it'll stick :)

Who's Matt?

Michael Sayman?

The creator of that app got re-hired by Meta. Looks from the outside like an pseudo-acquisition.

They don't understand their identity, because they don't understand the world. They only understand language, and some of the underlying connections that allow the language to be strung together. In other words, they may have something that seems like a world model, but it's a 2nd order construct that grows out of language, and is therefore quite weak.

Half of the video is an in depth look into the surprisingly deep history of animatronics. Worth checking out even if you couldn't care less about Disneyland.

The negativity struck me as jealousy. I honestly don't get it though. The YouTuber went through significant effort to save a very cool artifact, and then shared it with the world via a well made video. Bravo I say!

CF's customers may not like that.

And yet it still has competitors.

> “I’ll know it when I see it” isn’t a compelling argument.

It feels compelling to me.

That's what I was thinking of. Ironically, no amount of googling surfaced it for me, so I thought I imagined it.

Feels like something Google would do in the early days, but not now.

Global competition exists. If US companies can't hire the best, others will. I hope you don't assume that all the best workers/researchers are born within US borders.

Regardless, these are good changes, I hope they stick around.

> when we figure out what AI is good at and what it is not

We know. It's good at making stuff up. It's bad at facts or for generating things that withstand scrutiny.

> you can choose an instance

I'm out