This article is signaling that operators are exploring alternatives to Boeing, and revenue could shift from Boeing to Airbus in the future. That's the point of the article.
2,550 karma · joined July 15, 2013
jon[at]feynmannano[decimal]com
This article is signaling that operators are exploring alternatives to Boeing, and revenue could shift from Boeing to Airbus in the future. That's the point of the article.
Is different from moving away from Boeing planes... United is one of the largest operators of Boeing planes in the world, they have plenty of room to shed Boeing and purchase Airbus.
United is the largest operator of 737 MAX 9s. They operate 80 MAX 8s, with another 50 ordered. They have ordered 150 MAX 10s (which have yet to be delivered nor begin operating).
I have refused to pay for premium b/c they frequently wrap up paying members in their silly antics, and don't have the foresight to exclude paying users from their ad-block efforts.
That's an ironic statement, considering 13 hours ago you were begging the federal government to force RealPage and Apartment owners to stop colluding on rental pricing...
The commercial mobile phone network was invented in the 80's. Comparing market behaviors during the industry's infancy to the behaviors of established industries is wrong. The market took some time to figure out best practices, for consumers and industry health.
20's years ago roaming fees and texting fees where expensive, but then corporations figured out unlimited packages were more profitable. We pay a set price now for texting for the month, but it still costs the carriers money for each text we send. The carriers just hope that the power texters balance with the infrequent texters allowing them to turn a profit. The same with calling.
I don't know if regional networks could compete with national networks. I just want to reinforce that market practices at the industry's infancy aren't the same as they are now.
Your comment >> TSMC literally has an entire paragraph in parents comment that addresses it.
That looks like a single sentence, not an entire paragraph... And it's a paragraph without supporting evidence. No shocker c7DJTLrn wasn't convinced about parent commenters weak claim.
I'm curious, what university has a $200MM super computer?
I know governments have numerous Supercomputers that blow past $200MM in build price, but what universities do?
The Oscar II class submarine is a nuclear powered submarine.
That's a very shallow interpretation, as England had laid claim to the land in 1818.
"It is reasonably well established that Hans cheated online at some point."
[1] https://forum.killerchesstraining.com/t/paranoia-and-insanit...
Firouzja was 11 years old at the time of his ban and he was an unknown commodity at the time. He was quickly unbanned b/c it was revealed that he was just a kid developing very fast.
Hans' situation and Firouzja's situation are not the same.
Your on link says it was invented in winter 1942/43, WWII didn't end until September 45. That's plenty of time to train, equip, and utilize the technology in warfare. This article may not have been about Aquq-lung, but your book may have been accurate.
"The Aqua-Lung was invented in France during the winter of 1942–1943 by two Frenchmen: the engineer Émile Gagnan and the Naval Lieutenant Jacques Cousteau."
Nurses are professionals too, and they will never see anything close to $300k/year.
The challenge of the rich owning the land where a desal plant would go is an issue that can be solved in the current legal framework, but they'd rather scream about the problem than solve it. Desal is also not the only solution, there are political solutions too. Lower income folks could even solve the problem too, with their vote. It's not just a problem the wealthy are preventing from being solved. It's a problem the entire population of california is preventing from being solved.