Python: (Batteries included) Scripting language
Scheme: Functional/LISP language
Looks like you should learn either an OO language (Smalltalk, OCaml, Scala) or a Logic language (Prolog).
187 karma · joined August 22, 2008
Python: (Batteries included) Scripting language
Scheme: Functional/LISP language
Looks like you should learn either an OO language (Smalltalk, OCaml, Scala) or a Logic language (Prolog).
For an example of an original martial arts fighting game, Toribash is worth checking out and seems very interesting. My computer isn't powerful enough to play it though, so I can't give a review.
No, that would be his battered old canvas-fishing hat.
> Does he have two battered canvas fishing hats of which this one is the older of the two?
No, that would be his old battered canvas fishing hat.
Context
Plot Overview
Character List
Analysis of Major Characters
Themes, Motifs & Symbols
Important Quotations Explained
Key Facts
Study Questions & Essay Topics
Quiz
Suggestions for Further Reading
An author has no more right to claim ownership of this than they do any review/critique of their book.http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/02/xs500_electric_car_m...
And, oh, by the way, don’t rant about not having
background processes (or any other feature, for that
matter); I really don’t think that the lack of support
for them will hinder the development of this platform.
You are doing what he told you not to do; you're not allowed to point out what's wrong with the iPhone OS. It's perfect in every way. Stop criticizing it. My policy is, until I see a text editor as good as
TextEdit on another operating system, I won't even
consider a comparison between the two.
You forgot to mention your first axiom: 1) Nothing is as good as TextMate.
Be realistic here: VI(M), Notepad++, and Emacs are all great text editors.So, that said, it's not the HAVING the information that matters, it's the using of it. If I have your bank account information on my computer it's not illegal for me to have it (I think), but it would certainly give me jail time if I used it to take money out of your account.
Apparently, the operators are "venting their anger" at
high-level executive meetings with Nokia, whom they
believe are trying to wrest away control of their
customers and offering easy access to an app that could
potentially hurt call revenues.
Nokia is trying to control the platform and therefore the customers' user experience TO THE CUSTOMERS' BENEFIT and yet, you act like that is a bad thing. Clearly, Nokia does not believe the service provider's intentions have the customers' interest at heart, so they are trying to OWN the customer, rather than the service provider so that they can provide them with what they (the customers') want (ie. Skype). Nokia is trying to do what few other companies are and you are calling their attitude to their customers as "stifling innovation"? Wow.