6,010 karma · joined June 15, 2014
It’s really bad for fish though so I don’t use it all the time.
I’m increasingly surprised all this stuff works in that spectrum
The shots a woman has to give herself daily to stimulate follicle production are no joke. That would be a lot to put someone through purely for research. It’s not as simple as that. And it’s wishful thinking to expect any woman to do that.
This program isn't meant to be multithreaded, it's meant to be multi-/process/. The difference is that each instance of the application has its own independent address space. So that's one address space per instance. And because of that there are no threading issues. Also as a result any communication between different processes has to be explicitly defined.
Making this program multi-threaded would be a big mistake because then you couldn't use any of the HTTP proxies out there to monitor for connections and hand them off to this program.
This is arguably a much better architecture from a safety/security standpoint then trying to spin multiple threads each sharing an address space. It forces you to use OS-provided mechanisms for shared state rather than simply manipulating the memory to share information.
Somewhere at Tesla there's a junior engineer who's telling a senior engineer "I told you so!"
Also you're not required to have insurance. The individual mandate was repealed a couple of years ago.
The important thing to note about the moose test is that it doesn't specify that the moose has to survive. It's simply a test of whether the occupants will survive hitting a moose. I would wager anything that is designed to pass the moose test will kill anything that it hits that is below the moose's center of gravity. So actually the vehicle is way less safe for pedestrians than a vehicle that would fail the moose test.
But if all that matters is the safety of the occupant I guess this is okay.
> * The lack of engine means the entire front part of the car is a huge crumple zone. This gives designers more wriggle room for pedestrian protection too. This is an increasingly important requirement in road safety standards.
The kind of "crumple zone" that enhances pedestrian and cyclist safety is more like a beer can. Again, the crumple zones in this vehicle are designed to keep the occupants safe but not designed to keep any other road user safe.
The reason rail works beautifully in other countries is that you can get off the train and walk to useful destinations, even if where you disembarked isn't where you live. Shinkansen in Japan have tons of shopping, nice restaurants, and hotels all within a block or two of the station. So there's a reason for non-residents to stop as well as residents. And because everything surrounds the station there's no point for residents to go anywhere else.
* Advanced Roadmapping - JIRA will, given a pile of issues, sort them and fake-assign them to individuals on your team to determine how long it will take you to complete a project. This is way more powerful than burndown charts and cycles when you're planning a hardware project with a tightly-defined deadline. Without it I have to drop back to spreadsheets to provide any insight into when a project will be completed. It's especially important when the business peels engineers off the project.
* Time-based estimating - JIRA lets me plug hours in for estimates instead of railroading me into T-shirt sizes, which means I can actually use the tool to give an accurate estimate of when we'll be done. Linear requires you to calibrate your expectations by running a few cycles first, which makes it a really bad fit for projects that have a defined end date.
I think Linear has a lot of potential for teams that don't work to fixed deadlines, but for my purposes it's just a very fast spreadsheet.