HNHacker News
TopNewBestAskShowJobs

jsprogrammer

1,146 karma · joined March 27, 2014

"went from zero to Godwin in record time"

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12059810

submissionscomments
jsprogrammer··on No Exit
That is what the poster is doing.

Not long ago, someone from a code camp negotiated 250k total annual compensation from an SF short-term rental company.

jsprogrammer··on The going rate for self-driving talent is $10M per person
I doubt the average engineer at one of those companies got compensation of $10M. Most of the money/shares/options/compensation likely went to management and investors. It would not be surprising if sama made more on a deal than an acquired engineer.

Can we get a fact check, YC?

jsprogrammer··on Uber's billion-dollar losses expose the fragile state of the on-demand economy
Do the drivers go away? Perhaps one will give an investor a lift one day.
jsprogrammer··on Uber's billion-dollar losses expose the fragile state of the on-demand economy
> their money ends up subsidising a 10 minute taxi ride and being lost forever.

What? Uber is just a black hole? What about the driver? Who received most of that money for their services? That driver can now use that money to invest in the way they wish.

jsprogrammer··on The Fourier Transform and its Applications
`queySelector` only returns the first matching element (according to Mozilla docs).
jsprogrammer··on Deutsche Bank to fight $14B demand from U.S. authorities
Read the court notices some time. A few years ago, BofA sent me a notice saying they were settling all kinds of accusations of fraud for some billions of dollars, but noted that the voluntary settlement was in no way an admission of having committed any of the violations enumerated.
jsprogrammer··on Elon Musk on How to Build the Future
I don't think those are planned to ship until 2018.
jsprogrammer··on The Real-Life Plan to Drain the Mediterranean and Merge Africa and Europe
How would sea creatures get in and out?
jsprogrammer··on The Real-Life Plan to Drain the Mediterranean and Merge Africa and Europe
Alternatively, you could pump the water to land for desalination and agriculture.
jsprogrammer··on Elon Musk on How to Build the Future
Are Tesla's energy storage solutions available anywhere outside their vehicles?
jsprogrammer··on The rise of the corporate colossus is a giant problem
What type of data are you wanting to move? Would you just want a huge movable block of space that you could mount somewhere?
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
Laser propulsion could work. I'll need to learn more about the physics of it.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
Bouyant structures could be used, as well as wings, to suspend the track.

You can't run along the ground because you don't want to go too fast through atmosphere.

jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
The track would not run along the ground. You'd want to get height as quickly as possible to minimize atmosphere and track length.

Originating somewhere around Mojave and launching towards Las Vegas could work.

Alternatively, you may want to launch over the ocean for safety reasons, but it seems like you may be subject to more weather concerns.

jsprogrammer··on Uber starts self-driving car pickups in Pittsburgh
I agree the data should be open, I just don't think Uber, or anyone else, should attempt to piggyback on top of it.

Pushing other peoples' cars around does sound kind of fun, but I hope we'll have something better to do than frustrate commuters.

jsprogrammer··on Uber starts self-driving car pickups in Pittsburgh
Different sensors may have different responses. A separate collection would likely avoid any particular biases that Google picked up, as well.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
Most of the load could likely be mitigated by wings and buoyant structures.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
I believe the barreled design to be fatally flawed. An earthquake or other disruption during launch could be catastrophic to the vehicle. Much better for the vehicle to ride next to the track; in failure scenarios, the vehicle can simply detach and glide back to earth.

Yes, it means you have to go through the atmosphere, but it doesn't take far to clear. That will effect the calculations some, but not much. What will really effect the calculations though, is the cost of electricity. Generation costs will surely drop below $0.04.

Further, transmission loss can be almost entirely mitigated by generating and supplying the required power on-track.

Launches in favorable conditions (moon and/or planet alignments) would probably make some launches even cheaper. Of course, if the launcher were operating continuously, the savings would be used up during unfavorable conditions.

jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
Please see my response to kragen, where I derive the cost.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
$ is a unit of pennies

    $=100p
The calculation above was for a 10Mg payload. Payloads up to 3.2kg would cost under 100p under the same assumptions.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
I haven't estimated building costs yet. Several billion could be in the ballpark though.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
Not all vehicles are safe. The shuttle was >100,000kg incoming. Passenger vehicles to orbit could be on the order of 1,000kg, which would be much easier to make safe for gliding. Emergency parachutes could even be feasible.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously

    m=10,000kg
    a=90m/s^2
    vf=7500m/s
    vi=0

    F=ma
    W=Fd
    P=W(t^-1)

    t=(vf-vi)/a
    d=(vf-vi)^2/(2a)

    t=7500/90
     ~83.33s

    d=7500^2/180
     =312,500m

    F=10000(90)
     =900,000N

    W=900000(312,500)
     =281,250,000,000J

    P=90(281250000000)/7500
     =3,375,000,000W

     3,375,000kW * ((7500 / 90) / 3600 s/hr) = 78,125 kWh
     78,125 kWh * $0.04/kWh = $3,125 / launch

     10,000 kg/launch / 3,125 $/launch = 3.2 kg/$ = $0.3125/kg
Looks very close to your numbers. I maintain my claim.
jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
Acceleration over 200km will get you to orbit. The electricity required for a single launch is measured in US pennies.

An aerodynamic vehicle could be extremely safe; in the event of a failure, you could just glide back to the ground. The possibility of violent explosion would be practically non-existent.

jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
Easier solutions aren't necessarily good. Rockets are extremely dangerous and expensive.

The ~200km required is daunting, but imminently possible.

jsprogrammer··on Why Bezos’ rocket is unprecedented–and worth taking seriously
An electromagnetic launcher seems to be the way to go. Why is everyone spending time on rockets?
jsprogrammer··on To tell someone they're wrong, first tell them how they're right
Buzzfeed-style click bait. We are better than psychological tricks.
jsprogrammer··on JavaScript Conquered the Web, Now It’s Taking Over the Desktop

    x += 2;
    call(param);
    data.key = cache[0];
jsprogrammer··on JavaScript Conquered the Web, Now It’s Taking Over the Desktop
JS is safe C with types and pointers stripped from the syntax.

I don't get why people don't understand its popularity.

HTML lets you put boxes on the screen and CSS lets you paint-by-number(id/name/selector).

If you aren't doing any of those things, I am very curious to know what exactly you are doing.

jsprogrammer··on The Fourier Transform and its Applications
Looks like many others aren't interested in easier solutions.
← PreviousPage 8 of 34Next →