179 karma · joined September 30, 2013
Freedom of speech is (nearly) black and white. We cannot feel free to express our speech even if others find it offensive. If we do restrict it, that is not freedom.
Even so much so I can’t find shows I saw ads for in 2017 or 2018 even existing because they were so bad. It makes me feel the Mandela effect is happening.
By in the “West” what do you mean? US? North America? Any place but China?
Fixed it for you.
It’s been around for nearly thirty years. It entirely matters if they are saying “your site has poor SEO because it uses Java” rather than “because it uses JavaScript”. I’m glad you reinforced it without becoming arrogant or standoffish and seemed to meet your goal in working with him. I’m not sure I’d been able to do the same myself. Merry Christmas :)
Bias. Attractive and usability/UX are not one in the same. I find this appalling yet likely good usability.
Again I feel no offense. You aren’t helping mental health (or anything for that matter) trying to censor language that is in no way malevolent in its usage.
Yes they definitely are.
About a year and 8 months time lol
Seriously. It might not be one of the hip new languages with unique features but it’s a very mature language that is well battle tested, has plenty of libraries available, and the talent pool is very deep for Java hires. It’s also something that stands the test of time —- write code in 1999 on an old Java version it will still likely run on that version today.
Functions being even on there is laughable. “I have 0 familiarity with the language but I must give my opinion!!!”
And sanity… sanity is last on the list.
My best guess is trying to limit instances of AR models, encapsulating them in a new data access pattern versus traditional Active Record/ORM; in other words, misusing AR against how it was designed.