813 karma · joined November 7, 2010
Better hurry, and capture what you can before fellow humans are bored of it & find novelty in originality again.
Any AI on its own is incapable of doing any unknown computation, including current GPT. Try writing anything original, on the bleeding edge (likes of something that isn't available online), like writing contracts in bitcoin simplicity etc. AI is just replicating what the answer would look like, based on what it has seen.
2. Think of why is chatGPT making news? With copilot, chatGPT, instructGPT etc., openAI will simply copy your idea using their AI API if it is mildly successful, and launch it themselves. You really either don't wanna be using openAI API or must race against them.
Wdym, can you please explain? Decoupling is the only way to be sure of what?
...& bitcointalk has many more ideas OP might wanna fill his blog with
No, love is not chemicals & emotions but the state of chemicals & emotions that is cause-effect for inter-human attraction/stable togetherness.
Wow! IMAGINE THINKING LOVE EVOLVED at some point in time. There are other issues as well.
To start off if I defined love minimally as that which is the cause of attraction then,
--- What is the cause of attraction between poles of a magnet? * Using the socratic method, the concept of an "ideal North Pole" is inseparable from the "ideal South Pole", their togetherness is eternal and when they are not together they are attracted to be together, when they are together it is sustainable, so much so that the reason for their creation is for the other to exist.
Why do they behave so though? Because they are "circular". No they are not circular jk but because they have a "natural configuration" or simply put its their "nature". Nature of circles is to roll, similarly, what is an object that has nature is to be attracted to this subject. ---
Love itself, is eternal, and has no origin. It is name for a "thing"(conceptual, abstract, but a noun), like a circle.
We say one's mind is in prayer but technically whole of their "natural configuration" is praying. Similarly, we say someone's body is in the game, but their whole self is involved. Similarly thus, heart is in love but their "whole configuration" is in the act of active loving, during their existence.
At the very least it must NOT be taken for granted that a common subset of such configuration exists for all humans. Nature of their lover is subjective to lovers.
Furthermore, to end, when you study the properties of theos and of love, they turn out to be same 'things'; god is love and love is god. OP needs to read about what they are writing.
Blocks are an abstract entity relative to mempool
You, a mathematician, walk into the class to purchase a brick to label.
The first class has solved sudokus with deterministic difficulty to prove they did work to build the structure, whereas in the second class you have just dice sums & have to trust them telling you they rolled the diced only every fixed interval etc. It's distributed but not decentralized.
The first class was a public class & anybody could join in at any time. The second class had reserved early seats based on the initial supply of the dices; without investment in the initial dices the game doesnt start, whereas sudoku generation is free.
This is computer engineering. Please fix the title atleast on HN.