There was an article [0] and subsequent discussion on HN [1] about reverse engineering and patching the binaries.
[0] https://nee.lv/2021/02/28/How-I-cut-GTA-Online-loading-times...
976 karma · joined October 20, 2015
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/karlding; my proof: https://keybase.io/karlding/sigs/6RYb_SBJ3cAPDcj228kqB9ivjISZddnsSETccp_mJz4 ]
justkding.me
github.com/karlding
linkedin.com/in/karldingThere was an article [0] and subsequent discussion on HN [1] about reverse engineering and patching the binaries.
[0] https://nee.lv/2021/02/28/How-I-cut-GTA-Online-loading-times...
[0] https://carsdirect.com/deals-articles/2022-nissan-leaf-gets-...
If typing --perl-regexp gets old, you can always alias it or add a repo/global config option via grep.patternType [1]. Or you can create an alias for adding the less-powerful --invert-grep [2].
[0] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-log/2.32.0#Documentation/git-lo...
[1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config/2.32.0#Documentation/git...
[2] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-log/2.32.0#Documentation/git-lo...
The team also includes core developers Eric Snow and Mark Shannon (of the faster-cpython [1] proposal).
[0] https://pyfound.blogspot.com/2021/05/the-2021-python-languag...
But there are various projects for Python.
For example, there's Pyston [0] which was started by Dropbox. Or Cinder [1] which was started by Facebook. Or PyPy [2].
[0] https://github.com/pyston/pyston
I skimmed through your documentation, but it wasn't clear if this would handle workflows like the Chromium/AOSP workflows, where you have multiple repositories that are managed together via Google's repo [0] tool to give the illusion that it is a monorepo?
Occasionally you may have changes that span repositories and either need to be merged in a specific order, or in a single shot all-or-nothing merge "batch" [1]. This dependency information would be tracked either when the changes are originally submitted together to CI or directly in the commit message.
Of course, this means that you potentially have a small window where repo syncs may pull a partial set of changes, but usually this is solved via something similar to what Chromium calls "Sync to Green" [2].
[0] https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo/
[1] https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/docs/+/HEAD/con...
[2] https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/docs/+/HEAD/dev...
[0] https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=amaverify@gma...
As an example, Chromium [0] is a non-AOSP project that also uses repo.
[0] https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/docs/+/HEAD/dev...
The alias the author presents tries to implement the same functionality on a systemd Linux installation.
[0] https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=zzz&manpath=FreeBS...
In a vacuum, everyone would choose the best care available to them. Of course this is expected. How can anybody be expected to do otherwise when it's their life (or family member's) at stake?
Atul Gawande talks about this experience in Complications: A Surgeon's Notes on an Imperfect Science [0], where his son had been cared for by a full team of cardiologists, ranging from fellows in specialty training to attendings who had practiced for decades. However, due to certain complications, they needed to choose a pediatric cardiologist with which to schedule follow ups and decide on what procedures would be necessary in the future. One of the fellows, who had been the one putting most of the time in caring for his son, proactively approached them the day before discharge and suggested setting up an appointment.
It's common for fellows to receive patients this way, and at any teaching hospital, an attending is there to supervise and take over if needed. The entire system is set up such that residents and trainees are given opportunities to learn.
He says:
> A resident intubated him. A surgical trainee scrubbed in for his operation. The cardiology fellow put in one of his central lines. None of them asked me if they could. If offered the option to have someone more experienced, I certainly would have taken it. But that was simply how the system worked—no such choices were offered—and so I went along. [...]
> The advantage of this coldhearted machinery is not merely that it gets the learning done. If learning is necessary but causes harm, then above all it ought to apply to everyone alike. Given a choice, people wriggle out, and those choices are not offered equally. They belong to the connected and the knowledgeable, to insiders over outsiders, to the doctor's child but not the truck driver's. If choice cannot go to everyone, maybe it is better when it is not allowed at all.
IP: Innovation and Planning
PI: Program Increment
[0] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-config#Documentation/git-config...
Here's the BPO issue [1] that tracks the upstreaming attempt.
[0] https://github.com/facebookincubator/cinder/blob/9de726349eb...
All that's needed is a compile_commands.json file which can be easily generated via most build systems, or you can use Bear [3]/some other tool (or write a script that logs all syscalls and generate it yourself).
[0] https://releases.llvm.org/12.0.0/tools/clang/tools/extra/doc...
[1] https://releases.llvm.org/12.0.0/tools/clang/docs/LibTooling...
[2] https://releases.llvm.org/12.0.0/tools/clang/docs/LibASTMatc...
[0] https://cse.umn.edu/cs/statement-cse-linux-kernel-research-a...
The "annual plans" allow you to save a little if you use your device every month of the year on a single plan. The "freedom plans" allow you to suspend your service, and let you hop between plans. You just pay for a month at a time at the plan level you select for that month.
She took a seminar and an Introduction to Chemical Engineering course with Channing Robertson (at the time, the face of Stanford's Chemical Engineering program) and worked in his research lab, and eventually was able to convince him to join the board as an advisor. Then she was able to leverage her family connections to raise money and further lend a sense of legitimacy.
According to Carreyrou:
> She convinced Tim Draper, the father of her childhood friend and former neighbor Jesse Draper, to invest $1 million. The Draper name carried a lot of weight and helped give Elizabeth some credibility: Tim's grandfather had founded Silicon Valley's first venture capital firm in the late 1950s, and Tim's own firm, DFJ, was known for lucrative early investments in companies like the web-based email service Hotmail. Another family connection she tapped for a large investment, the retired corporate turnaround specialist Victor Palmieri, was a longtime friend of her father's. The two had met in the late 1970s during the Carter administration when Chris Holmes worked at the State Department and Palmieri served as its ambassador at large for refugee affairs.
> [...]
> In addition to Draper and Palmieri, she secured investments from an aging venture capitalist named John Bryan and from Stephen L. Feinberg, a real estate and private equity investor who was on the board of Houston's MD Anderson Cancer Center. She also persuaded a fellow Stanford student named Michael Chang, whose family controlled a multibillion-dollar distributor of high-tech devices in Taiwan, to invest. Several members of the extended Holmes family, including Noel Holmes's sister, Elizabeth Dietz, chipped in too.
That's not to say that due diligence was completely ignored. Certain VC firms, like MedVenture Associates, passed on Thernaos when they asked for specifics about her TheraPatch system and how it differed from the one they had commercialized with Abraxis. Apparently Holmes was unable to answer the technical questions asked during their meeting.
Carreyrou later summarizes:
> Channing Robertson, the Stanford engineering professor whose reputation helped give her credibility when she was just a teenager. Then there was Donald L. Lucas, the aging venture capitalist whose backing and connections enabled her to keep raising money. Dr. J and Wade Miquelon at Walgreens and Safeway CEO Steve Burd were next, followed by James Mattis, George Shultz, and Henry Kissinger. David Boies and Rupert Murdoch complete the list
> [...]
> Besides Theranos's supposed scientific accomplishments, what helped win James and Grossman over was its board of directors. In addition to Shultz and Mattis, it now included former secretary of state Henry Kissinger, former secretary of defense William Perry, former Senate Arms Services Committee chairman Sam Nunn, and former navy admiral Gary Roughead. These were men with sterling, larger-than-life reputations who gave Theranos a stamp of legitimacy. The common denominator between all of them was that, like Shultz, they were fellows at the Hoover Institution. After befriending Shultz, Elizabeth had methodically cultivated each one of them and offered them board seats in exchange for grants of stock.
I recommend giving the book a read if you enjoy books about white collar crime.
[0] https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/comp...
> Hopefully, the primary sources of randomness used by our production servers will remain secure, and LavaRand will serve little purpose beyond adding some flair to our office. But if it turns out that we’re wrong, and that our randomness sources in production are actually flawed, then LavaRand will be our hedge, making it just a little bit harder to hack Cloudflare.
[0] https://blog.cloudflare.com/randomness-101-lavarand-in-produ...
As the article says, there is room for improvement, so I guess it's good to see that the long term goal is 10ms round trip.
[0] https://www.theverge.com/2019/10/16/20917386/google-clips-de...
That's basically how strace is implemented anyways.
[0] http://openocd.zylin.com/#/c/4055/
[1] https://www.segger.com/products/debug-probes/j-link/technolo...
Buzzfeed News has an excerpt [0] from Alex Kantrowitz's book Always Day One [1], which contains interviews with former employees that describes the dynamic.
[0] https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/alexkantrowitz/always-d...
[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/52027218-always-day-one
[0] https://techcrunch.com/2020/12/07/uber-sells-self-driving-un...