870 karma · joined January 17, 2009
If you take a progressive enhancement approach and work your way up from low-end mobile to full-featured desktop, the process is 100x easier and the end result is, in my experience, an overall cleaner and more stable code base that makes for better performance across all devices/platforms.
I, on the other hand, am an atheist. My personal philosophies tend more toward secular humanism. I'm all for taking care of one another, just because it's the right thing to do. I think we have an obligation to one another to do so.
There are some Buddhist teachings that resonate well with me, but that's because they align with my sense of morals and ethics, not any sort of spiritual motivation.
Seriously, though... You're not going to be able to correct for most refractive errors. There are exercises you can do to strengthen eye muscles, but the amount of benefit you will receive from this is limited. There's only so much range of motion there to work with and that range decreases with age and the natural hardening of the lens of the eye.
That said, some people who do a lot of close work (such as working at a computer all day) can benefit, because their eyes get so used to seeing at one focal range that it becomes difficult to quickly focus at other distances, just because the muscles aren't used to doing it.
If you're really serious about it, see an ophthalmologist. There are a number of different types of vision therapies, from exercises to refractive lenses to laser treatments. Tell them your daily routine and your goals and they'll be able to help you find a combination that works best for you.
I agree about distractions, but if I'm reading, I just put it in silent mode and read. You don't have to use the social apps and check email constantly just because you can.
I know some people prefer the eInk display for reading, but I do most of my reading indoors and like (and at one point needed) the added contrast of the backlit display.
The physical requirements of reading for me, particularly as a young child, have at times been cumbersome - large print books, magnifiers, etc. When I try and read without those, my reading speed would slow to a crawl, but as long as I can see what I'm reading, I can read it. I never struggled with reading as a child. I've always been a very avid reader.
Of course, being unable to see what I was reading at all (where "see" is a relative term and could just as easily mean braille) I would never have learned to read, but that's more of an issue of lack of exposure to reading, not specifically a link between reading capability and visual acuity.
One thing that did come about as a result of my low vision with regards to reading, which (I think) helped me a great deal is that my dad read to me a lot. He recognized that reading for me was physically awkward to do, and so he read to me all the time, probably well past the age that a lot of kids are read to. I remember listening to him read books when I was 12yrs old.
Since he was the one doing the reading, he would read books with more sophisticated language than I might have been naturally exposed to in books at that age; books like "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea", "Robinson Crusoe," etc. So I ended up getting exposed to a lot of language and a lot of literature. This further motivated me to keep reading more on my own and gave me the vocabulary to do so.
That's certainly both good and bad.
The negatives, in my case, were that I would end up getting into discussions over trivial topics, or would end up reading tons of comments, some good, some bad, and comment on them just because I could.... For example, if I disagreed with you, I would tell you, event hough most of the time it was over things that just weren't worth the time and effort of getting into a debate with a random stranger over.
On the other hand, posting anonymously also gave me freedom to talk at length about things that matter to me but maybe aren't the best things to go talking about using my real name when everything is indexed in a search engine (politics, religion, etc.). I'll certainly stand up for what I believe in, but in cases like a potential client who may be looking me up on Google, my religious views, for instance, shouldn't be the first thing they find. It's just irrelevant in a work relationship 99% of the time.
So making the switch to my real name, I did lose some of that freedom, and one could argue that this is a bad thing, but for me, the constraints it places on the types of discussions I'm willing to have means better time management and (overall) more thoughtful responses when I do respond. I suppose if there was a real hot-button issue that I felt compelled to comment on, I would create a throw away account and do so, but sticking with my real identity forces me to think and evaluate those situations more closely before doing so.
But for better or worse, I decided to go the real name route this time.
The result is that I end up commenting on a lot less time-wasting content (and subsequently reading less because I know I won't participate in the discussion and reading often opinionated comments without participating will just frustrate me), and putting more thought into the responses I do post.
That's not to say that I think there's anything necessarily wrong with the anonymity. Sometimes it's nice to give voice to something you otherwise wouldn't because your opinion is controversial or unpopular (and doing business online, one has to protect one's online reputation and what ends up in the search engines). For me, though, it's translated to less time spent on useless AMA/AskReddit posts, more time spent on meaningful discussion, and less time on the site overall. All of these are good things.
A Pigma Micron might work well for you: http://www.sakuraofamerica.com/Pen-Archival
I do a lot of pencil drawings, though (http://orng.us/ob8yao) and I do find something magical about the feel of pencil on paper, and even the smell of the graphite. I can lose myself for hours. But if I'm writing, I like a darker line, which means softer lead, which means more smudging.... bleh.
After a few weeks of this, my handwriting got back to a decent quality and efficiency and now I find that I take notes on paper for all sorts of things. It's great for working through problems.
I tried a whiteboard for a while and it just didn't do it for me. I think there's something about the tactile experience of holding a notebook in my hand and scrawling on it with a pen; the movement, the sound, the texture of pen on paper, not to mention being able to keep and flip through previous work and go back and make notes in the margins that makes it far better than trying to work out problems on a computer or a whiteboard.
If you really think more people should be using plain vanilla JavaScript (and in a lot of places, I think this is actually true and even when a framework is needed, it's good to have the underlying skill) then the way to get them to do that is to educate them on it, not patronize.
What gets me is when people include jQuery and then further bog things down by loading a lot of plug-ins to do things that could easily be accomplished by adding a few lines of code of their own. Even if you do need and include jQuery, it doesn't mean you have to use it for every piece of javascript in your app.
Many times, a plug-in will do a lot more than you need it to do. If your primary goal is to just get rid of the 300sm delay translating tap events to click events, you don't need a library for full gesture support. You need half a dozen lines to listen for touch events.
If you just need to add some client-side persistence for a few basic things in LocalStorage, you probably don't need a plug-in with a complex query syntax.
Cannibalize a library if you need to and pull out the bits you need. You don't have to include the whole kitchen sink.
That's not how vaccines work, though. They create immunity through controlled exposure to the virus. If they were contributing to the "super clean" environment, then they would be preventing exposure.
On the other hand, he's excited about finishing his degree, which he has put off for many years now, so if this is what does it for him, it's a small price to pay.... at least that's what I keep telling myself. I suspect that once the excitement of the first couple of semesters of "hey, I'm actually doing this" wears off, he'll be buying used books like the rest of us.
This is what got me to back it (at the developer level). I'm just extremely curious and interested in seeing what I can do with the platform. It may start out as a Twitter clone, but I think there's a lot of potential there for the platform to evolve and grow into something more and I'm looking forward to see what I can do with it.
The area toward the top center, where you can see the color striations in the hills is, I think, the rover's primary destination.
I played with it a bit in Photoshop to attempt to correct for the atmospheric haze and wound up with this: http://orng.us/faquvj which may be (probably is) highly inaccurate, but it does make it very evident that there are a variety of rock types and a good deal of exposed geological history there to be sampled.
Maybe I'm the oddball on this one, but I couldn't do it.