keymone

And I answered. Have troubles with reading comprehension?

i've answered. you're dodging. what are you doing to stop putin?

yes, i've donated to ukrainian army that is fighting to stop the fascist russian scourge and i'm helping to coordinate delivery of humanitarian aid so that people aren't dying because of fascist russian scourge. all of that hopefully helps ukraine last enough for russia to collapse and become a dead wasteland with no oil or gas exports.

what are you doing again?

r&d in nuclear pretty much died down over past couple decades, it all went into wind and solar. and i think it's a mistake. safe compact nuclear reactors have been developed even with reduced capital, imagine where we could've been if we continued developing.

Talk to me about reducing energy from nuclear after you've done something to reduce energy from russian oil and gas. until then - go fuck yourself.

What kind of sick mind one needs to have, to push this anti nuclear bullshit when the real issue is a fucking fascist invasion of Russia into Ukraine? For fucks sake..

Russian ship, go fuck yourself.

Russian bot, convert yourself into a sunflower.

This wouldn’t have happened if the world stopped buying oil and gas from Russia and used more energy from nuclear power plants.

people of russia have control. they can go and protest or they can go and fight their fascist army. if they choose to do neither - they are complicit, so fuck them.

people of russia have control. they can go and protest or they can go and fight their fascist army. if they choose to do neither - they are complicit, so fuck them.

They should be standing on main squares of their cities or standing in territorial defense units inside Ukraine, not in front of ATMs. Zero empathy until the war is stopped, people are dying, we don’t give a single flying fuck that somebody is inconvenienced by atm queue.

> It continues to rapidly expand right next to Russia’s borders

this is bullshit. NATO is not expanding, NATO is not the actor that is able to perform that action, rather it's emergent property of sovereign countries choosing to join NATO.

So who is Putin to tell what sovereign countries can or cannot do? If he's so unhappy with a choice that sovereign country is making with regard to joining a defensive alliance, maybe he should offer something better instead and not behave like a crazy lunatic dictator?

There is nothing valuable in "look at it from Putin's perspective" argument when his perspective is tyrannical.

gosh, it's so hard to be respectful here...

your argument is:

1. US deployed nukes to Turkey, 2. to which USSR responded symmetrically by attempting to deploy nukes in Cuba, 3. to which US responded with blockade 4. and therefore Russian invasion to Ukraine is justified 5. because NATO may deploy nukes in Ukraine

4. simply doesn't follow from previous 3 points because the assumption in 5. is incorrect in three ways:

1. Ukraine is not in NATO so NATO doesn't have the capability to deploy nukes there 2. If NATO needed nukes close to Moscow - they ALREADY HAVE where to do that - Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland 3. US was responding with blockade to ACTIVE DEPLOYMENT PROCESS of nukes, which isn't happening in Ukraine

ok, is this better?

the last question is the most critical part of my comment. it's war and everybody who is malicious - is my enemy that has to be eliminated by any means necessary.

Ah yes, the “NATO will deploy nukes in direct vicinity of Moscow”, completely demolished by the fact that Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland are already NATO members on border with Russia and just as close to Moscow.

Now the only question remains: are you spreading this propaganda intentionally?

Edit: following guidelines

Is there a ready-to-use bot for that?

"has been blocked in Russia in the past" - Russia doesn't just unblock you for no reason after blocking.

new tech always tends to enable other new tech. also, maybe previously they depended more on deep infiltration by their own people in civilian clothes - those are also very active all around ukraine and actually they started showing up months before the invasion started. just 40-50yo dudes with very plain clothes and backpacks walking around the city. quite noticeable for locals that something was off about them. sadly the government or intelligence service didn't recognize the threat and take them out quick enough.

Yes, you are and no, they aren’t good people. They are complicit in fascism of Russia. Please pass it on to them - they are sincerely hated and should be ashamed. Unless of course they’ve been protesting and striking.

want some sanity back? quit supporting fascist regime. all employees are complicit if they continue working while knowing decisions of their leadership.

oh apologies if i don't give a fuck about their financial situation WHEN PEOPLE LITERALLY ARE BEING MURDERED BY A FASCIST REGIME. fuck you.

in 2008. and in 2014. and in 2022.

they use oxygen to pull the trigger on their firearms.

Let them. Bitcoin is about freedom.

This is what Bitcoin exists for. Over past 24 hours a 80BTC was donated, compared to 25BTC over entire existence of the project.

Fuck Patreon, fuck their employees for not blocking offices and protesting this decision, and especially fuck their CEO, please go bankrupt, shameful.

Please donate to help stop this russian fascist scourge: https://savelife.in.ua/donate/

whoa hold on there, apple is doing mighty fine with delivering updates to their hardware.

> Visa does the same

Visa doesn't do "the same", specifically, Bitcoin does what Visa is doing but in a decentralized, trustless and permissionless manner. That's where the cost of security comes from and why there is no waste of energy.

> Lightning offers precisely 0 of Bitcoin's guarantees

lightning allows to make tradeoff between liquidity and transaction cost/reachability, but settlement is still done on bitcoin, so bitcoin's security guarantees apply.

and yes, it's possible to DoS and possible to lose money if the node isn't operated correctly, it's emerging technology on the extreme bleeding edge of largest financial revolution in hundreds of years. give it time.

> There is no good/service that is (1) legal to acquire in country X but (2) can't be acquired more cheaply and easily with regular money than with BTC.

irrelevant.

> some goods/services that are illegal to acquire in country X may be perfectly moral to acquire

also irrelevant, but i'll point out that purchasing illegal good/service with bitcoin doesn't make bitcoin illegal same as purchasing it with usd wouldn't make usd illegal. bizarre that i even need to spell this out.

I can use as much energy as i can afford to buy on an open market, just like any other market participant.

> Visa can process the same amount of transactions on a few watts

comedic is your misunderstanding of what Bitcoin uses energy for. hint: it's not at all related to transactions per watt, in fact, Bitcoin is already capable of processing orders of magnitude more transactions than Visa through Lightning network.

> Bitcoin is a speculative bubble

Bitcoin is speculative investment for sure, doesn't make you right about everything else.

> illegal goods exchange token

very much legal.

Not at all! I can defend my position.