262 karma · joined June 30, 2014
But the government is not an institution that should be rewarding or penalizing behavior that is within the bounds of law. Obviously, you get -10000 points let's say if you commit a felony in the US. But you don't get +5xp for praising the government or being a good neighbor, or -5xp for being rude to a waiter or something. That's like, a few orders of magnitude of closer government behavioral management.
It's a tremendous difference...
So it's fine that one of the government's responsibilities is to track each citizens social score, instead of it being implicit in the judgement's of a person's peer-group?
Yes we all play some kind of "status" or "reputation" game, but the difference is that we can determine ourselves what is socially right by finding the right audience. In China's case, your only choice of audience is the government. You are forced to play instead of being a willing participant in your relevant social stratum.
Could one just implement an iterator on top of a tree structure? This would be similar but be imperative right rather than declarative as you would not provide a “callback”, but pull out nodes directly.
Seriously though, is GDPR compliance that difficult? What does a news site have to do to comply?
"Well-sourced" is not the only criterion. I could edit a page, citing credible sources, and still distort it by including implicit, one-sided interpretations of those sources results/contents.
Also, if the rules do not have, in short, "be objective", then yes, we should petition to change wikipedia's rules.
Step 2. ur sub problems better overlap
Step 3. time to table dat dag
Step 4. solve ur problems and build ur table graph the way a dag would : to-po-lo-gi-cal-ly
I wouldn't call myself a Java dev - I mean I know Java like 99% percent of the world does - so I may have a terrible perspective on this anyways. Although knowing the basics of how Java source code -> running process would certainly help any Java dev.