456 karma · joined February 11, 2015
Neither does "I've never seen it being used".
For example: as White, you can play 1. g3, 1. b3 or a reversed Queen's Indian and get by with zero concrete knowledge. As Black it's a little more involved but 1... d6 and 2... e5 takes about thirty minutes of research and you can play anyone under 2400.
This is not true. Opening knowledge is a common deciding factor in games between GMs, but that's only because they're already so good at everything else. A low GM actually probably has a smaller skill margin over other players in terms of openings than in other areas of the game: as someone that's arguably a decent amateur (~2200 USCF) and has played against several GMs, I would prefer my chances in a game where we both have our opening knowledge versus one where neither of us has opening knowledge.
This sounds like a horrifying way to go.
Control them, sure-kiting 100 units at a time would be a breeze-but using them together in a coherent way is drastically more difficult.
Remote: Sure!
Willing to relocate: Yes
Technologies: Scientific Python mostly (NumPy, scikit-learn, pandas). I also enjoy Scheme and C, and have some Java experience. I'm comfortable on *nix systems.
Résumé/CV: https://github.com/gabriel-komaromy/resume/blob/master/resum...
Email: gre5@case.edu
I'm an MS student in machine learning looking for a summer internship. Anything involving data/learning/AI would be great for me. If you let me work on reinforcement learning you will have my undying loyalty. I'm willing to go pretty much anywhere for the summer. I'm a chess master.
No, it isn't. The phone they're trying to break into was the shooter's work phone, provided by his employer. He physically destroyed his personal phone before the acts in question. The idea that he kept relevant information on his work phone, which he left intact, is absurd.