265 karma · joined April 11, 2010
I don't think she understands what eating your dogfood means.
The syntax makes no sense. How can this be aimed towards people not previously familiar with programming computers?
And how can this be considered intuitive?
>When creating a function, we can specify function arguments, which are sorrounded by parentheses and put in between the "^" and the "{". These "arguments" are just like variables, but which are only available inside our function.
What's wrong with python for newbie programmer?
client request1 --> web server --> rpc server --> work queue
<process other requests>
client request1 <-- web server <-- rpc server <-- done queue
Of course you need to create consumers to operate on the work queue, process the jobs and put them in a different queue (eg. 'done queue') signaling the rpc server that you finished the job so that the rpc server in turn will reply back to the web server.
And why every tool on HN now is called a startup?
You have to maintain state all the time and keep track of inconsistent/impossible states.
That to me is not cleaner or easier.
I work in one of the big corps, and it never fails, event driven servers tend to be way more buggy.
Python out of the box doesn't have coroutines but you can always use gevent for that.
Python threads are real pthreads, now they are not optimal and should not be used in high load servers, because pthreads are not that light weight when you are running 10k of them. Creating servers based on python threads is as clean as coroutine threads but slower. Hence, coroutines are always favorable over them.
http://www.jongales.com/blog/2011/02/14/list-of-content-farm...
user> mail-archive? are you crazy? that site has been around forever & I’ve found more answers there than I can count.
you> What mailing lists are you finding useful on mail-archive that aren’t available elsewhere? Do you ever visit mail-archive directly? I’ve only seen mail-archive clutter up SERP pages, often with the question I have going unanswered. I see no point in duplicating content on Google Groups, only with a significantly worse UI.
The point is, they are all doing the same. mail-archive, osdir, markmail archive mail, place ads next to them. Some provide more features on top but the main idea is archive public content and make money out of it.
You can always use gmane to search apache archives, at least it is ad free.
- osdir.com
- markmail.org
- www.dennyweb.com
This comparison is similar to saying that book X that has a total of 4 ratings, 5 star each is better than book Y that has 100 ratings, 4 star each.
Writing event-driven applications is very prone to errors and invalid(impossible) states.
Now I am always on alert when clicking on a link in the results to avoid the spam pages like efreedom, expertexchange and whatnot. Why not just remove them from search results?
They are causing enough bad publicity to Google.
I believe Google's results are less spammy than duckduckgo for this particular query.
query: Mailengine with .NET API
The right page that should show up is
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1720900/mailengine-with-n...
If you google the link below you'll see that the page is indexed.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1720900/mailengine-with-n...
However, the page doesn't show up when you use the query I mentioned.