Big players move slowly. Most of the times it is easier, faster, and more profitable to buy the startup instead of building their own product to "compete".
E.g., Google could have built something similar to adMob, yet it decided to buy it.
265 karma · joined April 11, 2010
Big players move slowly. Most of the times it is easier, faster, and more profitable to buy the startup instead of building their own product to "compete".
E.g., Google could have built something similar to adMob, yet it decided to buy it.
2. I couldn't get what is meant by "slash in" and "slash out" when visiting the main page.
If you have 100 users, each one waiting for a message in their queue, then you can "broadcast" a single message to all of the queues (or a group) with one command. All the users waiting for a message in their queue will get a copy.
Another approach which is hack-ish imo, is to use something like jabberd to broadcast messages.
oops
Create your product and only then you'll know.
Let me introduce you to Cython.
Focusing on what you do best (programming) and subcontracting what you do worst (design) leads to a great product imho. If you end up doing both, you'll eventually lose motivation because you'll never get satisfied with your own designs (you are not a designer after all). Not to mention that you'll be shifting focus back and forth between design/programming, and each one requires a different kind of focus and way of thinking. The end product if it sees the light? Mediocre at best.
Probably what should be tackled is how to maintain focus, and regain focus quickly.
If he goes to http://www.chromeexperiments.com/, he'll realize that all this is doable.