912 karma · joined September 15, 2014
A colon is used in this context, when you're introducing the question that follows.
Just check the AP & Reuters feeds each day. You'll get straight news, and you'll also save a lot of time.
Ironic that a prison radio station would have such a hugely overspecced piece of equipment!
Would appreciate it if someone could give me an example or two. As in, "A bad thing that can happen to you as a result of Verizon's actions is: [insert actual bad thing that can happen here]"
Since his ire is specifically directed at Google, I'm still left wondering what specific harm he is envisioning from Google's activities.
Are there specific examples of this type of harm? The only complaints that he made were that Google makes a lot of money (which I have no problem with), and that Google's conduct feels "creepy" to him (which is merely an emotional reaction).
He did hint at Google "modifying your off-screen behavior", and I was eager to learn about that as well... but then he left that unexplored too, and gave no follow-up or examples of that intriguing scenario.
That's not covered under "Fair Use": see [1] for fair-use criteria. It is definitely a violation of copyright, yea.
[1] http://fairusetube.org/guide-to-youtube-removals/3-deciding-...
I can tell you that virtually everything I’ve used, from networking (legacy to VPC) to storage (Cloud SQL v1 to v2) to Firebase (now Firestore with a totally different API) to App Engine (don’t even get me started) to Cloud Endpoints to... I dunno, _everything_, has forced me to rewrite it all after at most 2–3 years.
Wonder if there's something I'm doing wrong.
The malware needs to execute itself on each computer. But I would think this would be thwarted by hardware firewalls as well as apps like Windows Firewall.
If my PC at work gets infected, somehow it can magically infect the guy down the hall's PC too? I thought that was made impossible years ago.
Do I care if Google & Facebook track my viewing habits? I'm not sure I understand what the potential harm to me might be.
The murders didn't actually take place, but he did order them and he was under the impression that they were carried out.
To explain my mindset, basically it boils down to:
"Can something bad happen to me as a result of tracking?"
And nobody has ever said "Yes, here are examples."
Visually attractive site design though!
Always good to see the "critics said x, but supporters said y" habit as one indicator of impartial reporting.
> Our game console repair petition was denied, meaning repairs of PS4 and Xbox One systems are going to stay expensive.
Wonder why game systems were excluded? They're basically computers too.
...the computer was in charge in 22 rear-end crashes, [so there is] reason to believe that the AVs are doing something that makes cars behind them more likely to hit them. Maybe that’s driving herkily-jerkily (as we experienced in a Cruise car in San Francisco), or stopping for no clear reason (as we experienced in an Uber car in Pittsburgh). That’s not necessarily a bad thing. It indicates a conservative focus on safety: Better to stop for a fire hydrant than run down a preschooler. But part of being a good driver is behaving in a way others expect, which doesn’t include constantly stamping on the brakes.
I wonder if it might all even out, at the end of the day.
Funny.
Where does it end, LOL...