(I don't think so :-) just a thought)
183 karma · joined February 28, 2022
(I don't think so :-) just a thought)
(Or is there a 40 h/week limit or night work rules or something that prevents that?)
Having found product market fit is a sign of competence. Being good at marketing is, too. Signs of.
We tend to pay more attention to the negative and dangerous -- a survival thing, right (from when we were hunters and gatherers)
What if, though, they convince others that you're wrong -- so no one wants to use your software?
(although it would have been helpful to many)
"If you've found something that arouses interest and debate, you might be on to something"
And critique, or a gathering of enemies, is interest in something
(interest in the stuff the enemies in the game are guarding)
Lack of multiline indentation-ignored strings.
Since this behavior is so common, apparently it works, evolutionary:
It makes others think your are smart, for a long while
And not much effort required, on your part. So, a great opportunity?
And the more popular the project you start bashing is, the smarter you'll seem? Corollary: If one builds something great, one will get dissed by some.
Two identical keys, is less secure, for those who would otherwise have bought many different keys.
If you instead buy two different keys, then, when you lose the first, you can know it's safe to continue using the second one. And you can block the first one, without locking yourself out.
Maybe getting two different keys would be a good idea
(I don't mean for a CEO role, just in general)
Wow! How large is the organization?
(At what levels of management does such behavior become annoyingly prevalent?)
Definitely I wouldn't feel much pressure, as a WoW dev (had I been one).
And, giving everyone in the company a bit soft skills & planning & management etc practice & courses can make that process work even better.
Eg everyone reads Good Strategy, Bad Strategy. And everyone reads The Great CEO Within.
(Sometimes boring++ too of course, especially once at a big corp)
(I mean, if powerful execs get lots of money everywhere? almost)
> the justification that a good one is well worth the price.
that's just what they (the execs in bigger corps) say to fool the employees, make them shut up. Or to look good in the press?
Maybe you don't want the comment to be found by search engines
(Or both?)
I think systems nowadays are larger and more integrated, more complex.
Deployments sometimes are simpler, whilst other things instead are harder. Software will always be pushing the limits.
@d13 What if the house magically changed shape so the chair couldn't be used any more in that house? Suddenly one day you'll need to sit on the floor and eat, until you had gotten new chairs, for the new shape of the house
Who would you sue (the house or the chair company or no one?)
Or instead, when the house changes shape randomly and whenever, what about paying the chair company for upgrading your chairs to match the new shape of the house (and you'd never have to cook and eat on the floor)
(It makes little sense, I think, to compare software with chairs and houses. Unless the houses are magical as per above)