Gatsby to maybe?
183 karma · joined February 28, 2022
Gatsby to maybe?
someone apparently also living in Croatia (maybe another city? other social circles?)
I haven't noticed (although in Europe, northern)
(I run without a shirt :-))
Or did you mean the opposite, that there are eg more nudist beaches there
(Did you reply to "more open to nudism" or to "The west is prude")
Or maybe it can look suspicious if suddenly one reaches for one's towel?
I've never been in a nude sauna though, not common around here. Seems as if could be good, anyway, with a "safety plan" to avoid getting embarrassed
And later, when joining a better company, s/he more deeply understands the reasons behind their good practices -- because s/he has seen the mess, without.
Having seen and lived in mistakes, is life experience, can be useful. Depends on the person
No, it's Putin. He's an existential threat to the people in Russia.
Whilst NATO is not and he knows it. (Except for replying if Putin starts firing nukes.)
> if you count conflicts from Napoleon on up to WWII, from Russia’s perspective they have fought defense wars
That's not how people think. "Let's attack Ukraine because Napoleon ..."
I doubt you seriously believe in those things yourself, and the other things you wrote.
Indeed, not all but some of the attackers instead want to kill the men and rape the women in Ukraine -- rather than caring that much about their own tribe.
Some double digit percentage of the male population whether you are, starts doing that, if they have the chance.
It's reproduction, evolution, been going on for hundreds of thousands of years
"Star man"
Also, in some cases the expected destinations have been hacked already, I'm guessing
> multiple channels for exfiltration
If they can send via wifi, it could be almost impossible to detect? So much noise in the wifi space?
Good for the agency: More hours to bill, if re-doing that work?
Or that it learnt anything more than "yes this really works for us to maximize revenue and we can get away with it".
(I do guess it's better to not name them though -- because naming them risks making actually well behaved agencies or freelancers nervous about working with the client in the future?)
The agency didn't fail? They made lots of money and can do the same scammy thing again and again
More like a success story for them
> Honesty is key for all parts
I think it's not, not for agencies that want to maximize revenue
(Unfortunately.)
Seems you're a bit ideologically driven though, which is nice I think :-)
"Among equal engineers, get the cheapest one"
Otherwise, after a while, maybe others in the company would say:
The other execs don't make more than this:... Why should we pay you so much?
Rewarded... Maybe profit sharing? Then could pay back to do what's good for the company?
I'd like to try that :-)
(among some other things, like profit sharing for everyone, so that doing what's good for the company is good for oneself)
Look: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32094120
I asked how to fix that (what are your thoughts?)
(Without messing up other things the company is doing)
Thanks for writing about all this and warning people :-)
I wonder how much the actions Kapwing took has reduced the amount of scam attempts -- if you happen to know? Maybe hard to measure