leppie

Just a notice to the OP. Fortiguard thinks you have a porn site.

Web Page Blocked

You have tried to access a web page which is in violation of your internet usage policy.

URL: www.kyletress.com/blog/view/be_a_quiet_professional Category: Pornography

To have the rating of this web page re-evaluated please click here [http://url.fortinet.net/rate/submit.php?id=4F4333482C1C6F3E7...].

Powered by FortiGuard.

:(

For $25 a year, I would expect them to have some backup policy!

You obviously did not read the Moonlight vs IcedTea issue in Chrome article yesterday ;)

Just to confirm .NET/C# handles this and correctly. So does IronScheme.

Finger-pointing is always infantile.

Both posts are rather comical and infantile. Drama all the way, serial killers and Russians. Techno soap.

The link to the Egypt SE is also not connecting now. Scares me to what might be happening there.

Dang, just missed it! Anyone got a cached copy?

I noted this too. Seems the author has a broken C compiler.

I agree.

Does 'Engineering' imply software developers too, or is there just no software development in these startups?

Just get a paypal account. Or send/transfer me R40 and i'll transfer it via paypal if you are willing to trust me. :)

Yes, it is generally all about cutting costs.

The annoyance lies in the pain to recover a lost tab.

A bit off topic, but why can't tabbed browsers detect accidental (double) middle clicks when closing a tab?

Neither did I. Thanks :)

Why do people still insist on using DTD?

I was just wondering :) I am probably completely off target.

Here is a screenie of what I get every morning. Chrome 9 now (same for 8). 1st col is pvt bytes, 2nd is working set:

http://imageupload.org/?di=13129549812715

Edit: Interestingly after some usage, the memory gets freed, and it seems to return to normal again, ~50MB per tab.

Edit 2: Now I seem to get some Flash not responding dialogs. Sorry, it seems more likely a Flash issue, although I dont even have any Flash open on any tab.

Edit 3: Chrome stats: http://imageupload.org/?di=212954996318. Seems there is a problem with GC being a 'tad' conservative.

'Private bytes' as reported by Process Explorer.

I wonder if this (jQuery, not Twitter) is the cause of extreme memory usage in the latest stable Chrome. I get into work in the mornings and some tabs are using more than 500MB memory, other tabs are between 100MB and 200MB.

Dunno about everyone else's math, but going from 1024 x 768 to 2048 x 1536 is FOUR times larger, not double.

Given that 'mistake', 1024 x 1536 seems more 'doable'.

I think I was prescribed Edronax in 1999 for a very short while. The side-effect was knocking me out and caused me to sleep for 20 hours a day... I stopped very soon with them.

Me too :\

Wow, a Bachelors in Business and marketing aint so bad after all :) Now if only I had a CS degree to match my 4th chosen career path ...

Sad story, but this is what depression feels like, if I had such a skeleton in the closet, I probably would have done the same. :*(

Did anyone actually look at the PDF?

Chapters 2 - 4 seemed interesting, but has no content.

The rest seems to be a java code dump in a 1000 page PDF.

Ask a street bum, offer him some booze or food. He'll tell you.

I'll let you know if I die ahead of time.

Thanks, didn't know that. I thought it would have been the same.

Why not just pass *.c to gcc ? Same thing isn't it?