A shame they're critically endangered.
359 karma · joined October 31, 2023
A shame they're critically endangered.
I challenged your AI on this thematic : "a spring weight heavier when compressed", or "earth spinning make it heavier". Both results tell me it's not true despite it being correct (E=mc2).
I admit I'm cherrypicking, because it does say croissant is not French. But can I trust it blindly? That's why you must provide sources. It's valuable to have sources when we talk about truth.
good job anyway, keep working on what you like
The article is really hard to read if you don't care about storyselling...oops, storytelling.
I did an incomplete thesis on a niche research subject, traveled for month, switched to the industry now and even with that not so attractive profile from an industry POV, I was able to get second calls. But I'm not a dev, so maybe dev market is saturated idk.
edit: after looking at your CV, I can confirm that you could change some things such as:
- emphasize your projects, they are less promoted than your professional experiences yet they are more important!
- missing softskills, human ressources will look at it. Even basic things like "teamwork" or "dynamic" is worth to mention.
- ideally, every skills should appear inside a project too.
- Change or remove first sentence. change "always had passion", it's not true as you saiid in your post. Trade passion for motivation in any case. Add one where you say what you are looking for in your new job. Adapt it to the company eventually.
- Jobs details could be shorter as they are not related to the actual position you're looking for. Remember, only put usefull information.
- Do you have license driving? Also add your current location and mobility (obviously not in the public version)
I hope it will help you and that you'll land your first interview soon.
It use neural network techniques, but it's not strictly using NN.
it do the same result as Nerf from google in 30min, nvidia result in 7minute. It can achieve more than 100fps if you let it train longer.
https://www.inria.fr/fr/3d-gaussian-splatting-vision-ordinat...
when taking notes in school, it is advised to keep some space on your paper to make questions and answers.
It would be perfect to have a note taking tool, with anki inside it that automatically take the question and the answer of let's say a paragraph. Could be even done fully automatically with LLM I believe, extracting essential information and turning it into a Q&A.
Given the many reaponses, it would be fun to aee if llm beat humans on understanding the sentence ahah
also let's not forget that there are animals too who suffer. And thy don't have AC, water bottle, or fridge to live.
this one, took me little time to figure out how to use wireshark, get data, input command with my phone...eventually the voltage regulator died a day after for overcurrent or dead chip. But it was fun. I don't have the motivation to undead the device unfortunatly.
I don't see a real advantage if its only "selling argument" is just proposing an initial structure that still need rework anyway.
That's why there are demands for regulations only after scientist looked over the shoulder of industrials. At the end, scientists often only look at things, the don't decide about regulations and economy.
Backing out would require a lot of courage, but not doing it put a serious threat to the efforts of keeping the climate change at a not-too-catastrophic level.
Talking about terraform, in 2011 in germany they did test renewable powered methane production via electrolysis and Sabatier process. I can't find any news about it, but it's exactly what terraform is doing.
Terraform claim to produce H2 at less than 2.5$/kg, but I find different numbers when looking at scientific publications (it's between 4.8-7.5$/kg).[0]
They also claim to produce from "air", but C02 capture is really poor and it's better to capture it from industrial plants. But anyway, it's not a big problem.
An other problem is the water cost of electrolysis.
[0] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-021-01322-8
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10311-021-01322-8
an interesting paper for you :)