lonelappde

> crafted to exclude non-white US citizens from the electoral process.

Reads a lot like

>> pushed with discriminatory intent.

You seem to be confused about what the point of disagreement is

How recently?

Public airport or private?

"Retail" or privately hired pilot?

President Trump already did this, right before the coronavirus crisis.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2019/8...

Why? Because cutting benefits is popular with his supporters.

Callously cutting benefits for a miniority of the populat is populist for the selfish majority.

Why would doctors and pharmacists refuse to serve you? What's their incentive?

I don't know, why do people try to propagate their genes? I'm sure you've got a better handle on the situation the the force of billions of years of evolutionary history.

Are all your "nots" in the right places?

Real Talk:

no one is trying to kill you for profit. They just don't care about you because you're can't make money for them. It's still bad, but different.

You meet a lot of skeptics because no matter how honest or correct you are, without access to a large test population and a way to precisely measure your dozens of tiny ideas that add up to a healthier overall life, it's impossible for an outside observer to distinguish you from quacks like Gwyneth Paltrow.

Also, being upfront about your suffering makes people uncomfortable and avoidant. Not your fault, but that's life.

You have a lot of disappointment with HN, largely because you see all these rich people who like talking to you but won't invest in you.

My advice: take a lesson from them. Put on a fake happy face, rewrite your narrative so that your pain is in your past, copy the obnoxious marketing techniques that smell foul but work.

You're in a "line" where everyone thinks you are bullshitting. If you can't beat it, join it. Run your effort the same way the dishonest snake oil salesmen do, and use your own conscience to tell you you are doing good. Make a little money selling whatever to health fad chasers, and put that money to good use as you see fit. Answer to no one but your conscience, but behaving in the way "polite society" demands, not because they are right, but because that's how you'll get paid attention and money.

It's a bit rude to name something someone made a point of not mentioning.

How is charging X more for Y's behavior not screwing X?

It's trivial to say that cheating in a competition is a winning strategy as long as you don't get caught and punished.

They were talented but the talents were theft, fraud, and self-dealing, not capital allocation.

As far as I can tell, only one of those people (Rubin) was substantially GS affiliated. Still, pretty bad.

Congress passes laws, not the President.

The repeal passed the Senate on a near party line vote (R over D), sponsored by 3 Republicans, and passed the House will nearly all R and 2/3 of D.

Clinton could have vetoed it, though, since the Senate didn't have a two-thirds majority.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gramm%E2%80%93Leach%E2%80%93...

Of course, looking to the future from the future, a veto would likely be irrelevant since Bush took over a year and a half later.

That's 5% of GS shares. Did it push the price down?

What do you mean? How does the order of adding ingredients influence passivation?

You should create an acid water mixture before adding the mixture to another chemical.

Most people don't care about RAS syndrome, except semi-intelligent people who think grasping at (incorrect) pedantry proves they are smart.

I know you meant land when you said "house prices", but it helps to keep using the correct term to avoid misleading confusion. Houses are terrible money pits. Land (in an economically active location) is a scarce valuable resource.

This is important because people overbuild SFH not understanding the expenses, and people ruin their financial lives buying mobile or fake-mobile homes to put on rented land, not understanding that the land is where all the value is.

Who assumes that a bank account over the FDIC limit is safe?

And who cares if rich people take a haircut in a recession?

Hmm, my machine doesn't.

Things breaking is the natural order of the world. No one needs an incentive to break anything, merely a lack of incentive to fix will suffice

What about the other 40 windows?

Using two large monitors is bad for your neck.

> but we (meaning computer users) spent decades downloading sketchy executables for our Windows PCs.

This is sadly not a valid comparison. Our PCa have a far more critical role in our lives now, have far more power to hurt us, and are reachable by 1000x more malicious actors.

We are in a new, dangerous world. We need much better OSes with much stronger sandboxing for our modern world.

Russians were genocided by their own government, not a foreign power (except for the many used as meatbags in WWII).

Should Twitter build and advertise a tool to let user opt in to suppression hyperactive users from their view of Twitter?

Should Twitter update their algorithm to give their judgment of a better content experience to users, or should they be hands off and let SEO spammers control the content experience?

What's better-- the right project over budget, or a broken nothing that is under budget?

Vicious cycle

Trademark infringement us not legal. Google/Doordash are selling a different product and clearly labeling it as Saddleback.

It's more of a meat avarice than a meat shortage.

Back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, BSD License literally had an "advertising clause".

The only question would be whether it should be used only for non-transferable "moral" authorship or transferable as the author chooses.