438 karma · joined May 31, 2024
For everyone else, you start running into the issue of the classic https://xkcd.com/927/ situation. The problem of ever-changing frameworks will always be a constant. People want different things from their frameworks!
Also Amazon was a key reason why the ruling indicates the other stores must have access to play store apps as well.
Additionally, Google royally messed up this entire case from the start by being so openly egregious. Amateur hour sending emails about buying a company to shut them up from suing you.
Amazon used the excuse it wasn't acting as a distributor and thus shouldn't be held responsible for protecting the public from these products
This is a way to permanently entrench their positions while maintaining ownership. Not an eradication of copyright.
That is hilarious. Either he's a very dedicated troll, or he genuinely has no idea how MJ was trained and doesn't grasp how absurd his demand is.
I understand the attempt to remain neutral sounding, but all that’s doing is making it easier for people to ignore.
What you're asking for is a DSL built on top of Rust for the purpose of creating web apps.
What makes the most difference in building to learn is the tiny steps you take to build. Printing hello world for the first time, changing it and seeing something else, using inputs for the first time to print hello, [variable], getting that image to animate across the screen. Each step becoming a great foundation for further curiosity, rather than turning your project into a black box.
In contrast, I've heard from a bunch of people who wanted to learn software development, but now don't see a point since AI can do it. Same with drawing. There's a large growing apathy towards learning skills I've noticed.
This is why most advocates for it don't do it from the perspective of learning. They do it from the perspective of building fast in the hands of those who already grasp the foundations.
A lot of MMOs also make active collaboration a complete pain, whether it's introducing a messed up matchmaking system, not dealing with bots, or adding new content that rewards you for going at it alone. A lot of content now is quite literally zero communication, not even a message in chat, just queue for group, do content and leave.
And people will spend 5+ hours a day doing that. Farming mindlessly as if it's a second job.
There are some general ones who won't use targeted personal advertising, but for the most part, this personal information is why you will never see gym supplements being advertised on feminine beauty channels (despite channels being open to the money), or mascara products advertised on a gamer channel (again, despite them being open to the $$$).
So we'll never know for the time being! Unfortunate to those who wanted a definitive answer (or to confirm/deny past beliefs).
The core of the problem is really in this very paragraph:
> Right now, the tradeoffs people are asked to make online are too significant. Yes, advertising enables free access to most of what the internet provides, but the lack of practical control we all have over how our data is collected and shared is unacceptable. And solutions to this problem that simply rely on handing more of our data to a few gigantic private companies are not really solutions that help the people who use the internet, at all.
There is no solution to this. You can't advertise effectively and profitably without personal information. No matter how much you try to chop up and anonymize data, it's still personal and even in the absence of information you can wind up collecting a lot of data about someone (as browser fingerprinting does often times). The more information you have, the more is paid. Not even Apple avoids this, despite their privacy claims, and they too see there's far more money to be made as an ad network than letting Google gobble up the space.
But as much as I personally dislike this, my guess will be that this is the most successful (financially) change Mozilla enacts.
For them, the ability to generate so much trash is the good part. They might not even be fully aware that it's trash, but their general goal is to output more trash because trash is profitable.
It's like all those "productivity systems". Not a single one will produce a noticeable increase in productivity magically that you can't get from just a $1 notebook, they just make you feel like you are being more productive. Same with RP bots or AI text editors. It makes you feel so much faster, and for a lot of people that's enough so they want in on a slice of the AI moneypit!
The problem with where you place your trust is that this then has to repeat every generation that has not had to deal with such controversies on a large scale, and that when people are emotionally motivated it turns off that rational part temporarily so they don't care about what was previously claimed.
Until both of those are adequately accounted for, this is going to repeat endlessly as people love controlling others.
Yet “AI writers” isn’t really a thing journalists/bloggers refer to them as. It’s interesting from the outside, as neither a writer or an artist.
The fact that leadership was even seriously considering abandoning one of the worlds best public pension funds is indicative of how short term greed is killing the province.