Large scale transformer blowouts are a nightmare scenario due to how long they take to replace / repair.
2,363 karma · joined February 7, 2014
Large scale transformer blowouts are a nightmare scenario due to how long they take to replace / repair.
Or on the flip side does it actually make it harder to use a small subset of the population to steal an election from an apathetic population at large.
I.e. you'd still be able to take advantage of the apathy but it'd be a much slower moving change towards extremes and polarisation which is pretty good for democracy in general.
I guess an upending isn't a totally accurate description but I haven't seen banks this motivated to innovate in a long time.
Yup, and you break my ability to zoom in or right click and view image on mobile.
Welcome to the future.
I am saying they are clarifying what they mean by repeating them selves and changing the definition.
Has their TOS actually changed here? If so, in what way? Does it now include more specifics?
This isn't my bias speaking here, this is a contextual reality, the world has constraints and there isn't any iteration of what we have that would allow this reality to evolve.
The only wiggle room you have here is on free speech grounds but we have already figured out, that this does not apply here.
Good question, so why are we removing all this content?
Racists are not a protected class of people. They aren't afforded those same rights. And on some grounds their disruption of society actually puts an onus on you as a platform to restrict their access.
Redefinition.
And again, nobody here is denying Nazis were racist.
How can you say it played a major role in the outbreak of war when you can't even say it without tacking on the real causes with an "and" all while ignoring the USA turned a blind eye to the lot of it until Japan got involved?
Nobody here has said it didn't play a role. And it did play a major role later on in WW2 but that's not what this thread is about is it?
Did white supremacy cause WW1 and WW2. No.
Did it play a part? Yes. Why are we talking about this? Because AP minced their words and should have just said nationalist racism.
It historically and factually was not.
It played a role.
It was not the cause.
Nobody is saying Hitler wasn't a racist (wtf.)
Suicide / death is as extreme as things get for living organisms.
It's not bigoted to state facts you don't like. Mean, maybe, if I time it right. In fact someone calling you a bigot in this isntance actually makes them a bigot.
Talk about a useless insult.
And re your edit, it's not a clarification it's a redefinition and that's what scares people.
And you're right, it has always restricted illegal content. And that's a good line to draw.
So..
What's illegal about this new content?
Or what has changed that they now think they're ready to judge what is extreme and hateful?
Or what has changed that they now think they even should?
Why do you think a nation of free speaking individuals is patently not entitled to say what they want on a platform specifically created to allow people to say whatever they want?
To be absolutely clear on my position, I am not saying YouTube is acting outside their rights to censor content. But I am very much saying people have a right to be peeved about the bait and switch.
Further to my point. People being concerned about who and what specifically will be caught up in this is well, well within reason to bring into question given their current approach to takedowns which consistently missflag videos inappropriately.
"It's their business they can do what they want" isn't a valid argument against any of these questions, you're just stating a fact that doesn't answer or even acknowledge the potentially problematic situation at hand.
Edit, this is an honest question. It's my impression these wars were caused by nationalist movements. The first didn't even involve "whites" until later and it certainly had nothing to do with white supremacy.
The second world war got very white supremacy eventually but again, zero fucks to do with the cause. Hell America turned a blind eye to ALL of it until they got dragged in, that's how little it had to do with anything.
(Not some gun toting denier nazi here, it happened it was disturbing as fuck and it was a big deal, but please don't run around claiming this made up narrative)
No.. they buy GitHub so they own pretty much most of open source software. Embrace.
Then they release a new package registry, one to rule them all, it supports all the things. Extend.
Extinguish, I don't know, that's why I asked the question, I don't know what the play here is.
Is it simply they now fully control distribution?
This doesn't sound like an issue until we're 10 years down the line and nobody creates package managers anymore. Nobody mirrors Linux, and everything has to go through GitHub.
Like I would think this is my own bias, and it certainly sounds tinfoil hattish to even me, but then I haven't forgotten those memos. Have you?
They don't actually care one way or another about Taiwan or Tibet.
The problem is that if they let it happen it shows the rest of the country that they're able to get out if they choose to do so.
Try to think of China more like the EU and Taiwan as Greece or Britain.
This is like taking your MySQL app and running it against MongoDB with a bunch of hacks to translate the SQL into mongo calls.
And then claiming you did all this so you could "avoid a rewrite".
Some architectural decisions are far reaching and leaky. This is not the ideal but it often is the ideal trade off. The alternative is decoupling to the nth degree resulting in a hunk of junk impossible to change that won't get off the ground.
That's the point!
Speaks a lot bout what agile truly is and how scrum is a very large mismatch.
Your emotions can effect your actions and decisions like anything else. Are we to apply the same logic to how advertising made me feel a certain way leading to a purchase u wouldn't otherwise have made?
We are talking measures of degree here but it's a spectrum that is incredibly difficult to nail down.
What constitutes being of sound mind?
I'd drop a lot of money on a particular docker feature that hasn't been dealt with for the last 3 years running.