I have always assumed that the world's most talented hackers work in places like Silicon Valley and Wall Street, but Stuxnet was clearly the work of some brilliant minds, so I'm curious.
1,373 karma · joined March 29, 2008
I have always assumed that the world's most talented hackers work in places like Silicon Valley and Wall Street, but Stuxnet was clearly the work of some brilliant minds, so I'm curious.
This is the central "Official Google Blog", not an engineering blog. From the other articles on the blog (most of which are written by marketing and other non-engineering disciplines -- see the last lines), it's pretty clear that the intended audience is anyone who's interested in Google, not just programmers. I know lots of non-programmers who like to read these, especially since a lot of news sites link to and quote these articles.
IMO the linked video does a better job at introducing the feature than the article.
http://www.kiplinger.com/tools/bestcities_sort/index.php?sor...
For example, note that Honolulu has a salary coefficient of 92, but it's actually one of the most expensive places in the country to live. It has a cost of living coefficent of 171.
Another thing is that in addition to cost of living, one must consider state taxes, which you can calculate here:
http://letsrebuildit.com/index.php?option=com_jumi&filei...
WA, NV, TX, FL, and IL have very low state taxes (for me), whereas DC, CA, HI, NC, and NY have high state taxes.
Not sure what Zuckerberg has to do with this story, so bringing him into the discussion seems like a red herring. Whether Zuckerberg is a good guy is a separate question; maybe Saverin and Zuckerberg are both assholes (or maybe neither).
My argument is founded not on experimental data but rather on the axioms of utility theory. If startups had higher risk AND lower expected payoff, it would make no financial sense to found or invest in one, since that would be a textbook example of a bad investment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_market_line
Yet there are lots of (otherwise) smart/rational people founding and investing in startups.
A lottery has negative expected return, so I disagree that it's "higher expected return that a conventional job".
I disagree. If he's using "average" in the sense of "mean" (not median), then he's saying that starting a startup has a lower expected return and is higher risk than working a normal job, meaning it's inferior in both regards (assuming diminishing marginal utility). Entrepreneurship is a classic "high risk, high return" venture. It has a higher expected return than a conventional job; that's what makes it financially attractive to founders and VCs in the first place. The astronomical success of the minority offsets the lack of success of the majority.
In a similar vein I disagree with his assertion that joining a startup (taking a risk) is like buying insurance (avoiding a risk). They are opposites.
http://madconfessionsofaman.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/douc...
Similarly, being introverted doesn't mean you have low social skills.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflammation#Inflammatory_disor...
Clojure 28.8
Python 26.5
Haskell 19.7
C 17.3
Lua 16.4
Lisp 11.5
Erlang 9.9
Ruby 8.4
Scheme 8.1
C# 7.9
OCaml 7.3
Smalltalk 7.1
Scala 6.4
D 4.4
CoffeeScript 3.6
JavaScript 3.5
Forth 3.2
Groovy 2.9
Assembly 2.5
Ada 1.7
Objective C 1.6
Perl 1.6
SQL 1.4
Pascal 1.3
Rexx 1.3
Delphi 1.2
C++ 1.0
Tcl 0.9
Fortran 0.7
PHP 0.7
Shell 0.7
Java 0.6
Actionscript 0.6
ColdFusion 0.4
Cobol 0.1
Visual Basic 0.1http://www.genome.gov/images/content/cost_per_genome.jpg
It's surpassing Moore's law. Looks like pretty soon we'll reach the mythical $1000 mark.
> Many of today's corporate PCs are saddled with management, backup, and security agents that can bog down a PC. Employees want their PCs to boot in 10 seconds, not 10 minutes...They're drawn to uncluttered Macs...
I don't see how this shows superiority of Mac over PC; presumably if the Mac were running this software it would have these problems too.