Updated Date: 2026-03-11T07:13:31Z
Creation Date: 2001-03-09T23:23:30Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2027-03-09T23:23:30Z
There is also this:https://www.infoblox.com/blog/threat-intelligence/abusing-ar...
784 karma · joined November 2, 2019
https://github.com/m3047/
...or...
hackernews3047as@m3047.netmeet.hn/city/us-Tacoma
Socials:
- github.com/m3047
---
Updated Date: 2026-03-11T07:13:31Z
Creation Date: 2001-03-09T23:23:30Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2027-03-09T23:23:30Z
There is also this:https://www.infoblox.com/blog/threat-intelligence/abusing-ar...
> Humans walk at roughly 2.1-3.0mph. "European cities" are listed as having bus stops 984-1476 ft apart, which would imply you'd typically walk half that to reach the nearest one (492-738 ft), which for a fit 3.0mph person is 2-3 minutes, and for a frail old 2.1mph person is 3-4 minutes.
> Of course, people can be further away than that (they live orthagonally to the bus route), but you get the point. If you doubled bus stop distances to 1476ft apart, it would not add many walking minutes for the users.
Given four "bus stops" spaced at the corners of a square of dimension d, and a linear relationship of distance and time such that d == t, the distance to a stop along the edges of the square is at most d/2 == 0.5d. As the crow flies (straight line) the distance from the center of the square to any of the corners is sqrt(2*(d^2)) / 2 or (approximately) 0.71d.
But people don't fly, rather geometric physical reality is something sometimes called "manhattan distance" which essentially means that they need to walk to the edge and then along the edge (or zig-zag block by block, which amounts to the same thing just repeated at smaller scale). In this case the distance walked to any of the corners from the center is exactly d. Unless you live in the middle of a park (with stops at the corners) d is the best outcome. In a physical environment other obstacles may present which require backtracking; indeed, the bus routes (and hence stops) are likely optimized to avoid backtracking, acknowledging this physical reality.
In the beginning I got hit with something and was misdiagnosed, and almost died; hypertension didn't fit the narrative so was initially ignored. By the way, when you don't sleep for three months it fucks you up. No attempt was ever made to even acknowledge that there might be a root cause for the hypertension. The hypertension drugs worked until they didn't, and they started gaslighting me about it. Bear in mind, in the context of the theme better sleep will help with hypertension (demonstrably true!).
You need to cultivate awareness as well as evidence-based skepticism for this to work. One of the herbs I take interacts with the beta blocker I still take, and if you weren't paying attention it could kill you (nobody told me, or the herbalist, about it). Some of the herbs are pricey, but none are over $80/pound. All in, it costs me about $100 / month, and two hours of my time every three days (to boil herbs). Quite frankly, if the pills work then just do that; but don't treat it as a "solve", get to work and identify some of the root causes and what can be done about it... before they stop working or start making you sick.
Anecdata: 1) A good friend whose anxiety was largely alleviated (and sleep improved) by recognizing and treating their iron deficiency. 2) I have to (can't take the Western drug which was prescribed any more, and the Western doctors can't seem to bang the rocks together) take herbs for my hypertension but as opposed to the side effects I was experiencing from the drug I joke that all of the "side effects" from the herbs are good, they're targeting imbalances which were not recognized / treated previously and lo and behold I settle and sleep better... which helps reduce the blood pressure.
(I accidentally ended up in what I can only describe as a beer automat some months ago. It was billed as some sort of friendly living room to the meeting organizers, and was loaded with propaganda pushing that premise.)
As a term of art the "deconflicted", neither dominant / submissive, middle-right is sometimes referred to as the "Dale Carnegie quadrant".
I've been using it for a number of years to diagnose the personality dynamics humans erect around software and tech stacks. I had mused about it, but done nothing, until I came across a SxSW talk about Lacanian analysis of the personalities of various computer languages... just for fun of course.
(Compare Nanos and Docker... see what I mean?)
This is the problem with the notion that "in the name of securitah IoT devices should phone home for updates": nobody said "...and map my network in the name of security"
[0] Don't confuse this with Rachel's honeypot wildcarding *.nothing-special.whatever.example.com for external use.
People should know that they should treat the contents of their logs as unsanitized data... right? A decade ago I actually looked at this in the context of a (commercial) passive DNS, and it appeared that most of the stuff which wasn't a "valid" hostname was filtered before it went to the customers.
Stumbled onto this because I've been using TCM (in consultation with an herbalist) for blood pressure, relatively successfully, for a couple of years. Of course they didn't have blood pressure cuffs in the Ming or Han dynasties, so we're not really treating blood pressure... Researching astragalus and di huang is what led me to it.
You can see multiple doctors (among the ones you're allowed to see by your insurance). The doctors are all in an echo chamber which reinforces their thinking. Their cognitive load and goal seeking is burdened by what they can determine they can bill insurance for (there is still no price transparency). You don't have a "regular" / primary care physician because they rotate through the provider network constantly.
Symptoms which don't fit the diagnosis are ignored / dealt with by deflecting that you should "see your regular physician". "Stare decisis" rules the second opinion. In their minds they believe they have no place to write down e.g. drug interactions with things which they didn't prescribe and don't believe in (the one time I got a call from quality control working for the umbrella organization I utilized this as an example of why I was looking for a different doctor and the QA person, who was, they said, a licensed nurse, said "they can add that to the record, I'll do it right now").
You might get fired as a patient for passing out or having a seizure during a blood draw, hard to say whether that's because they failed to follow SOP and call the meatwagon or because you upset staff by acting unusually. You might get into a conversation with a physician which goes strange and they end up telling you that their clinic gets health inspections like a restaurant... they don't. There's a "wet work" inspection (just like a butcher shop) before occupancy is allowed, but there's no posted inspection report because... there is no inspection! But there's more. There are relatively "safe" and common procedures which still have ooopsies and people end up in the hospital or die. The hospitalization rate might be 1:5000 and the death rate 1:100000 but if you do a million of these there are going to be a few. If the procedure took place in a clinic it's supposed to be reported, and the reports are public record; but surprise surprise, the reported rates for serious complications are far far below what the actuarial tables show.
If you're seeing constellations of incidents similar to these, you need to get a second opinion from somewhere / somebody who is not caught up in that particular bubble. It can be very hard to see what's happening, and also to find a measurable proxy for "in / not in the bubble".
Honestly, it shouldn't matter. Anybody who's using a stub resolver where this matters, where /anything/ matters really, should be running their own local caching / recursing resolver. These oftentimes have options for e.g. ordering things for various reasons.
There's also so much of it, and it mostly works, most of the time. This creates a hysteresis loop in human judgement of efficacy: even a blind chicken gets corn if it's standing in it. Cisco bought cisco., but (a decade ago, when I had access to the firehose) on any given day belkin. would be in the top 10 TLDs if you looked at the NXDOMAIN traffic. Clients don't opportunistically try TCP (which they shouldn't, according to the specification...), but we have DoT (...but should in practice). My ISPs reverse DNS implementation is so bad that qname minimization breaks... but "nobody should be using qname minimization for reverse DNS", and "Spamhaus is breaking the law by casting shades at qname minimization".
"4096 ought to be enough for anybody" (no, frags are bad. see TCP above). There is only ever one request in a TCP connection... hey, what are these two bytes which are in front of the payload in my TCP connection? People who want to believe that their proprietary headers will be preserved if they forward an application protocol through an arbitrary number of intermediate proxy / forwarders (because that's way easier than running real DNS at the segment edge and logging client information at the application level).
Tangential, but: "But there's more to it, because people doing these things typically describe how it works for them (not how it doesn't work) and onlookers who don't pay close attention conclude "it works"." http://consulting.m3047.net/dubai-letters/dnstap-vs-pcap.htm...
There seems to be a memory hole about what follows. Probably not the "key limiting factor for life" you had in mind.
There have been various incidents where soldiers or people generally in third world countries have developed neurological diseases when machine oil contaminates (or is mistaken for) cooking oil. This isn't new, it's been happening for 100 years. There have also been cases of pilots becoming, or allegedly becoming, disabled due to inhalation of jet engine lubricants which find their way into the cabin air supply (passengers are notably not mentioned in most reporting).
Although intentional use of the more toxic compounds is generally avoided, machine oils are subjected to harsh environments and compounds can change, new compounds created. Kind of like dioxin contamination in herbicides, I don't see much evidence that oil additives are rigorously tested for unusually toxic compounds incidentally occurring during the manufacturing process.
I'm glad they're burning that shit under an exhaust hood in the picture in the article, hope it's turned on!
Apropos the memory hole remark above, here are some articles I found briefly looking around although none of them were ones I remember previously seeing / reading (such as the "famous" case of the British machinegunners in North Africa).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_soldiers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organophosphate_poisoning
https://www.machinerylubrication.com/Read/30448/know-lubrica...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11254977_The_Toxici...
I get your point, hope you get mine: we have less legal entities operating as "farms". If vibe coding makes you a "developer", working on a farm in an operating capacity makes you a "farmer". You might profess to be a biologist / agronomist, I'm sure some owners are, but doesn't matter to me whether you're the owner or not.
The numbers of nonsupervisory operators in farming activities have decreased using the traditional definitions.
So +1 to you!
DISCLAIMER: I've been around IT for probably the majority of y'all's lifetimes, so I'm not saying this happens often. But just because something is fundamentally wrong, doesn't mean that all fundamentally wrong things are the same. In my experience they differ more from each other than the possible good ways of doing the same thing. Don't conflate things without a good reason.
I view it as exercise. If people don't need me to prep their data or fix their internet plumbing, I have other things to do (and it's possible someone will see the work and I get a side gig, it's happened before).
Ironically yesterday I was stapling wire cloth at the top of the stairs on the wooden deck because it gets slippery.
It is hard to find good handy help. They "repaired" a gutter by nailing it to the crown moulding, which is not structural (resulting in the failure of the fascia, but I digress); repaired copper supply lines with plastic; didn't tighten a slip ring on a sewer trap in the crawlspace. We just had a new roof put on, and overall they did a competent job but there is one leak, coming from a problem we explicitly paid them to solve, and getting that fixed is going real slow. The guy responsible for that aspect is obviously not a native english speaker; OTOH we prevailed on them to install some overhangs, and the carpenter worked with us and allowed us to paint the decking / sheathing / soffit which would be exposed before it was installed. During one of my burnouts I worked as an estimator for a high-end wood flooring company; literally over half of our competition was illegal, unlicensed, and sometimes part of an acknowledged criminal enterprise (not totally throwing shades at people who aren't from here, we had five crews and the Italian and the former Russian physicist (beautiful inlay work!) crew leads were class acts). But I digress.
I've done crazy shit my whole life, my dad died scuba diving at 52 (cause of death was inconclusive) but his brother lived into his 90s. A couple of years ago my father-in-law died after a fall; he was taking photographs in a park. Somehow when he fell he broke his neck; could have been a stroke, but he never really stabilized enough to find out, was dead within a week. He was in his 80s.