make3

this prevents you from using any commercial model then, because commercial models need to hide thoughts to prevent distillation

OP was clearly a joke about Copilot making bad code

very repetitive, all sorts of weird style decisions & reimplementions for no reason

Claude Opus 4.0. ok but no one cares about that old version man

I'd like to push back

Transformers are not Markovian, their whole point is arguably to be the reverse of Markovian, to efficiently make it so the new tokens are a function of all previous tokens

Shazeer is mostly an IC, weirdly enough (source: I worked with him).

Demis is the CEO of DeepMind, it's completely different.

Jumper.. the AlphaFold team left & made Isomorphic. I was always surprised that Jumper hadn't gone with them.

I just think that people are running to pre IPO Anthropic to make bank.

It also feels like Anthropic is the new Google though. They actually try to not be evil, and are actually at the frontier of new tech.

you can't know if an improvement is just due to compute, this was a lesson of the early scaling, the whole emergence phenomena, new capabilities emerge even only from more compute & data

in theory the IPO pricing is already set

This felt like a vacuous post by a LinkedIn influencer.

Pharmaceuticals are not a question of taste like alcohol and food, they're strictly a matter of purity, stability and toxicity, which is clearly better supported by being produced by an industrialized country with sometimes hundreds of career chemical engineers running the show in a billion-dollar company with processes etc., & who have liability for lawsuits worth hundreds of millions of dollars if they put anything remotely close to the shit recreational drugs are cut with, like horse tranqualizer and deworming agents and whatnot.

The best elites can dream of is pharmaceutical levels, but even the most pure illegal stuff comes from a production line that's isolated from the rule of law and from transparency and liability and also likely from actual professionals, so it's likely still more toxic than it needs to.

The real "advantage" of cocaine is mostly that the molecule has an inherently stronger euphoric effect, I would assume (I've never taken it), also making it a worse therapeutic if you want to actually do a better job vs just feel "high".

There is no Claude 4 Opus model... It's a series of model, of which the strongest is Opus 4.8, and Qwen 3.6 35B-A3b gets 51.5% on Swe-bench pro to Opus 4.8's 69.2%

why take cocaine when you can get your doctor to prescribe Adderall to you

hallucinogens where taken by hippies, it was probably a way to put a few extra commies and lefties in prison

it's revolutionary in genetic research, allows us to observe cells with specific gene knockouts, over activations, etc. it's just very hard to deliver to a whole system

maybe de-rlhf unleashed agents

Will ublock work with this?

you don't get the model when you buy the data center, & no amount of running smaller models on a tiny 200k$ "cluster" (that's like one 4 gpus node, not even 8) will get you remotely close to Fable 5 level performance

the feedback is for something mindless though, "we don't care about societal harms". I wonder the overlap between these commenters and tech maga people, eg crypto bros & Elon stans.

You're being too literal, they're saying people are not thinking with a philosophically interested mind, which is blatantly the case here, their point stands.

"I will push back and say" it's only paternalism if it's about helping the user's not harm themselves.

This is about societal impacts, not wanting their models to be used by some people against other people, as a weapon.

this reasoning is inverted lol they would get a lot more information by letting you use it. so much weird drama around reasonable guardrails for an experimental model

Why is this surprising or a problem?! It's a model demo, & their reasoning is reasonable and fair. Why all this drama.

what does this mean

4.6 had functional but very poor quality code

parasocial media

I think it's normal for non-technical people to have no idea of how things work and of what to expect. It's our responsibility to communicate. And, within reason, theirs to listen.

they don't know that it'll break, that's the problem of course

I also care about my desktop supporting consumer electronics without having to waste an afternoon debugging Bluetooth drivers every two weeks