make3

I wonder if you can have it reason in caveman

1.5B and insanely under-trained. Size didn't mean much before the scaling laws papers came out.

we essentially have AGI right now brother

there's no due process in the US, the state is completly corrupt and captured

it's a bit scary how a lot of people are completely fine with an insanely wrong status quo of a fully corrupt and anti democratic government and of ppl like Altman allying with them.

not in the UK (or the US) since king Henry VIII made himself Pope of his new Anglican Church in the 1500s

the thing could barely make full grammatical sentences, it's funny to see that even then they were overclaiming the fuck out of their myself

either that or AAA games mostly becoming streamed from Clouds like Nvidia now

gaming too I guess still

Trying to build things in a way that they have to be resistant to missile and drone stand is not a very reasonable scaling constraint. That's why we need non stupid leaders who don't start pointless wars

hitting the electrical grid is a war crime, not so much an AWS server farm. optics / progressive escalation does matter

it's like a faster than light spaceship company using horses. There's been infinite solutions to do this better even CPU only for years lol.

they also need to understand human behavior a little bit I guess, & that's pretty complicated (so not just social, social of humans specifically)

it's funny because domesticated cats have much more developed frontal cortexes than their ancestors & it would be one of the things that feral cats lose to genetic drift (meaning, no conservation pressure in the wild). whatever boring stuff we have them do is apparently extremely mentally taxing compared to the wild.

Absolutely not, the former relies on controversial ideas to qualify as legal.

Stealing the content from the whole planet & actively reducing the incentive to visit the sites without financial restitution is pretty bad.

but doesn't it break the assumption that it should ideally be able to reproduce your original results

why me specifically or only though. your comment comes off as peachy and annoying.

just "eat the food you cooked" would be fine. drink your own champagne sounds like such corporate group think bullshit I'd be tempted to change workplace on the spot

tanks must represent like 0.001% of fuel consumption lol Road uses like cars, trucks and buses is 47% of all oil, and clearly an enormous fraction of that can be converted to use electricity instead

It's funny talking about non software stuff on HN. I'm sure there's hundreds of papers on simulations and expert analysis of this.

read up on the RNA world theory, it's so cool

why is someone making money out of it a bad thing, if they're not preventing other people from using the code?

I don't know why it's still a respected brand when everything they do is mid at best

I always wonder why rockets are millions of dollars each, that seems insane to me.

spending your productive output making one of the most powerful terrible people alive more powerful just sounds depressing to me. do you really want your research to be how to make the personality of Elon's anti woke mind virus LLM better at erotic talk.

I guess it comes down to your daily efforts serving only to make the world a worst place, vs having a neutral job

they all made 600k-800k USD and up and are highly employable, you definitely can blame them

It was up last week, now no one really needs to read the post

You could try to get a degree on the side (not saying necessarily in comp sci) just to make your life more resilient to bad economic situations, and maybe more interesting

insane cope

It's weird to me to train such huge models to then destroy them by using them a 3 bits quantization per presumably 16bits (bfloat16) weights. Why not just train smaller models then.