manbash

Happy to see it resolved and I hope the other developers are able to have the same experience.

By the way, was it only for the Windows application, or was wireguard-go was also affected?

This will likely not see the light of day. It's the usual PR that gathers many "partnerships".

Expect to see lots of these in the upcoming months as the big companies scramble to keep from losing money.

Keyboard & mouse user here. To lessen the pain, I moved to gyro-based gaming. I think 8bitdo has those. I specifically use the Switch joycons. I recommend you just get yourself a good BT dongle.

As someone who has both interest in VR and racing sims (and other sims), and tried VR and loved it, I am genuinely NOT INTERESTED in owning a headset for the obvious health reasons that come with using one.

There is no way this ever can be close to safe for your health than, say, not using it.

CSS is awesome?

No

Yes

> [Paladin] Attack!

This somewhat of the equivalent of "quitting cold turkey", in the sense that you remove the temptation from your reach.

The problem is that it's just much easier to un-quit and run the LLM in the same laptop you work on.

It's just so very tempting.

This is very cool. I couldn't find it it already supports duets. I assume it won't.

Copyleft was intended as a principle to keep the software free (as in 'freedom'). Proposing to lock out certain areas of the codebase is directly opposite to this principle.

Yeah, it really wasn't about the school.

Folks here can decide for themselves whether to check green accounts' "Show HN" these days. We are all aware of AI slop and creep in all shape and form.

Moderation is already taxing as it is.

I think it's a nice break from vibe-coding. It feels like a good direction in terms of use cases for LLM.

I was reviewing a confluence page which was reviewed my many stakeholders. Something bugged me to an excruciating extent about the content of the page: something was off at some parts of the text. I inspected the page and it turns out the font color somehow changed to a mildly grayer color than black. This was likely due to a copy-and-paste that has gone wrong.

Wait, I am curious how Gemini "pushes" devs to GCP.

This paper seems like something I would like to keep as reference, especially with its approach to employ STRIDE and present very elaborate DFD (which you don't see as often in my experience).

The DFD in 7.1 is quite impressive.

"software developer" is pretty broad. Here this is specifically B2C (business to customer) applications. I only assume that you haven't been in this market sector, otherwise you would've been more familiar with GDPR and all the concerns that prompted it.

There was a time where the Internet was the wild west and you could've easily been personally targeted and exploited. Businesses sold your data to whoever.

Even today, if you decide to accept all cookies, you're safer than what you used to be.

Rejecting the non-essential cookies puts you in the safest spot from bad actors.

Respectfully, what was the purpose of this comment, really?

And I also disagree, your suggestion is not easier. The & operator is quite intuitive as it is, and conveys the intention.

> i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter.

Making it seem like there's only going to be one mass layoff round. There will be another one, you can be certain.

Yup don't expect up-to-date practices and always come with the expectations that your security will be flawed.

It's nice that they explain the "what" (...it is doing) but not the "why". Who is going to use it and for what reasons?

Also, if it's essentially a sort of metadata, can't the output generated image be replicated (e.g. screenshot) and thus stripped of any such data?

RE agents are really interesting!

Too bad the author didn't really share the agents they were using so we can't really test this ourselves.

No, it's not. You assume it was stolen, while it wasn't implied in that comment. They simply stated that the data have been put publicly at some point or another.

Exciting! It doesn't imply that we should now sprinkle the new annotations everywhere. We still should keep working with proper iterators and robust data structures, and those would need to add such annotations.

Chiming in: indeed, the response is very dry, and raises suspicion. It states the obvious facts and then makes a boring statement, lacking any nuance of the conversation. It is not argumentative in the very least.

Time has been spend, yes. But the topic at hand is after so much time the conclusion to abandon this path is justified.

The list of issues does not seem to stem from whether they had used this build tool (CMake) nor others (nor official build environments).

Why laptops specifically (and not also desktops)?

AI and LLM specifically can't and mustn't be allowed to publically criticize, even if they may coincidetally had done so with good reasons (which they obviously don't in this case).

Letting an LLM let loose in such a manner that strikes fear in anyone who it crosses paths with must be considered as harassment, even in the legal sense, and must be treated as such.

The models generalized "understanding" and "reasoning" is the real myth that makes us take a step back and offload the process deterministic computing and harnesses.

A bit off topic, but I am curious about your experience with Structurizer. My experience wasn't so positive (albeit the general incentive that it's open-source and local).

I have worked with Wayland + Flameshot for the past 2-3 years and it seems to work fine as far as I can tell.

Oh, definitely. Also, they end up getting stuck in a loop, adding and removing the same code endlessly.

And then someone comes and "improves" their agent with additional "do not repeat yourself" prompts scattered all over the place, to no avail.

"Asinine" describes my experience perfectly.