518 karma · joined October 10, 2017
For example many have switched to qwen3 models but some still vastly prefer the reasoning and output of QwQ (a qwen2.5 model).
And the difference between them: those with "plus" are closed weight, you can only access them through their api. The others are open-weight, so if they fit your use case, and if ever the want or need arise, you can download them, use them, even fine-tune them locally, even if qwen don't offer access to them any more.
The further we can go, the further we will go.
The more CPU power we get, the more JS heavy websites get.
The more images we can generate, the more we will generate.
The more we can do, the more we do, whether we should or not.
I had the same issue then tried edge and it was smooth.
/s
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45062683 (Anthropic reverses privacy stance, will train on Claude chats)
You can still get the pinephone at the original price from the original store
edit: You're right, an unfortunate downgrade https://forum.fairphone.com/t/fp6-discussion-about-usb-2-and...
Don't forget when the pronunciation depends solely on the meaning.
Live or Live?
A bento/transformer type would be neat. One that can Switch between the 2 modes. Not clamshell or slide.
Simple, switch when they find something that fits their need. They don't have to switch everything at the same time. And it's not just about switching technologies, it's probably also about fighting against pushbacks ("lobbying", etc), dealing with training, and other unforseen (at least to the layman) things that happens when a huge entity starts pulling away from microsoft. I don't think there are degooglify/demicrosoftify-yourself manuals at the state level.
People who don't like CS:GO type of games won't find any value or interest in some "player who can consistently headshot fast-moving targets". Some people just like seeing their favorite game break in unexpected ways. It's a bit like going into someone else home in the same building with the same floor plan, or just the mirror tracks in a racing game, everything is uncannily familiar, and this uncanny feeling is enjoyed. Maybe you just don't see the appeal, which is fine as well.
I think you meant:
The main advantage of behemoths is their ability to buy startups like candy when they are to big and become risk-averse. Then you don't see startups becoming behemoths anymore, except for the unicorns (called unicorn for a reason).
> Your saying there is a difference between making choices that resulted in homeless being the only option and choosing homelessness because its the best available option?
Absolutely. For example, if a city wants to build systems to help them, one group would need counseling, temporary housing, while the other would rather haver access to public showers, a dispensary, and another group none of that.
Let say you're in a place that attracts a lot of backpacker/vanlife, whatever you build there you would make people pay for it. There would not be any food bank close to that place.
- Vanlife (not homelessness)
- living in a tent out of necessity (homelessness)
- living in a tent for an experiment/fun/holidays (not homelessness)
Today we introduce OLMoTrace, a one-of-a-kind feature in the Ai2 Playground that lets you trace the outputs of language models back to their full, multi-trillion-token training data in real time. OLMoTrace is a manifestation of Ai2’s commitment to an open ecosystem – open models, open data, and beyond.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStL7niR7gs (The Rules for Rulers / CGP Grey)