38 karma · joined February 4, 2016
> Don’t we want Apple to be able to say that they can’t help China track the communications of dissidents or other repressive regimes?
People are more worried about the US' being the "repressive regime".
The poll released is telling of how power is kept in the US. You don't have to have 100% support, just over 50%. Here we see that the FBI is far more sophisticated than they let on, and supported by a more cohesive program considering support for them is just north of 50%.
Because network tapping is fast becoming expensive, they provide the out-of-bands tapping as a service. An out of bands tap is like having a splitter on the wire that copies the signals that pass through the wire but does not interact with the data in any other way other than to copy it.
Attackers cannot see the out-of-band tap, but they can try to attack or detect its presence.
The infamous NSA tapping of AT&T's entire communication network in California was an out of bands tap. It copied all of the communication passing through the AT&T central comms node in California to a NSA controlled data site through an out-of-bands tap installed into AT&T's network in the form of a fiber-optics splitter.
If Donald Trump were smart he'd likely pursue the UBI dependent on how much money the US makes versus the number of citizens. This would definitely trigger the same kind of mentality resident in welfare states like the nordic countries to resist immigration.
How would this be addressed in the US? Would it signify a change in the immigration trend in the US?
Atleast Japan is trying to actually have a viable solution:
http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2016/01/28/japan-first-steal...
The F-35 program is the biggest scam in history. The people in charge of it need to be put in jail.
Who do they write these things for anyways? It's not like we're college admissions or professors, just give us the straight deal. Unless you're pitching to schools and naive undergrads of course.