matja

Were you expecting to be able? The tech specs say "One external display".

I'd guess senior level candidates should solve it without copying and pasting, perhaps make sure test cases are present for the behaviour before modifications are made, and then generalize the existing functions. Or, state why adding more functionality on the server side for every type of arithmetic operation would be unnecessary complexity, and instead add support for any type of atomic arithmetic operation with a transaction/UDF approach.

which AVX-512? :) - https://twitter.com/InstLatX64/status/1114141314441011200/ph...

To fully appreciate the silence between notes, you must experience the full orchestra version of John Cage's 4'33"

Being able to enter a debugger on NMI is great because now you can trigger the NMI from any set of hardware conditions too - you can connect logic gates to the address bus to decode a range of addresses, "and" it with the memory write assert pin or IORQ pin and now you have hardware breakpoints for a machine that didn't originally support it.

Indeed, neutrinos appear to not be completely understood, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_p... -> ctrl-F

Surely a removable power cord would ruin the whole aesthetic!?

I mean, its as unstable as balancing a broom upright on your hand is... unstable but not impossible.

You can try with Imagemagick (https://legacy.imagemagick.org/Usage/fourier/#im_fft) :

    for quality in 50 75 90 95 99 ; do
      # FFT
      convert source.png -fft +depth +adjoin source_fft_%d.png
      
      # compress FFT magnitude and phase
      convert source_fft_0.png -quality $quality source_fft_magnitude.jpg
      convert source_fft_1.png -quality $quality     source_fft_phase.jpg
    
      # IFFT
      convert source_fft_magnitude.jpg source_fft_phase.jpg -ift out.$quality.png
    done

$100 USD PCIe 4.0 SSDs exist (e.g. 500GB SN850), which can comfortably run at close to the theoretical limit of PCIe 4.0, bottle-necked on PCIe 3.0.

Is it because the mainboard is not HDMI 2.0 or does not support DSC (Display Stream Compression?) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI#Refresh_frequency_limits_...). Raven Ridge supports 2.0, but it's down to the mainboard to also support that.

If fail2ban is theater, so is a firewall, so is SELinux, so are filesystem permissions (a properly configured process would only read/write the files it's supposed to, right?).

If an remote vuln needs some stack-smashing technique that has a low probability of success, fail2ban is going to to slow that down - perhaps in a way that makes it more obvious in logs, buying you time to discover your broken configuration or out of date software. Same way that a firewall buys you time to find that your database is listening on 0.0.0.0.

And WRX80 has dedicated chipset lanes (https://www.amd.com/en/chipsets/wrx80), so effectively more PCI-e than EPYC, and bootable NVME RAID support on top.

Indeed, it is a little faster single core and a little slower in multi-core on average compared to my 24-core Zen 3 EPYC (https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/13330272?baseli... - which I expect to be slightly slower than the new 24-core Threadripper Pro 5965WX) - certainly comparable in terms of performance. But no word yet on if the M1 Ultra supports ECC RAM or how many PCIe lanes.

And those are the ones that we know about.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasily_Arkhipov

AFAIK the crucial part of this, is rsync's `--link-dest=DIR` parameter, which hard-links an unmodified file to the respective place in "DIR", rather than making a copy.

I remember one of the early "selling points" of nginx was it didn't traverse the directory tree for a .htaccess file to dynamically load config from, for each request, when that was specifically a "selling point" of Apache, which is very useful for shared hosting contexts when users don't have access to change the webserver config.

Can also use cachefile=none and the name does not matter at all. Every disk vdev has a unique guid in the ZFS label area. Without the pool cachefile the guid is used to reliably assemble the pool, instead of the kernel device path.

And there's no specification on how that wear-leveling works (or doesn't work).

I'm sure it'd be a patch of a few lines to make the type specification mandatory on the command line (I would certainly prefer that also), but it comes down to the opinion of the maintainer if that is wanted or not.

Agreed, luckily there is a solution ;)

    jo -- -s a=123 -s b=00123 -s c="$(date)"
    {"a":"123","b":"00123","c":"Sat  5 Feb 21:29:08 GMT 2022"}

What's the issue?

then use -s :

        jo -- -s opaque_id=001979
        {"opaque_id":"001979"}

Agree, I was surprised that the cURL feature was considered as it seems to go against the "Do One Thing" and composability points of the UNIX philosophy.

I like it, very concise but retains all the features you need.

`jq` can construct JSON "safely" from shell constructs, but is rather more verbose - e.g. with the same examples:

        $ jq -n --arg name Jane '{"name":$name}'
        
        $ jq -n \
        --argjson time $(date +%s) \
        --arg dir $HOME \
        '{"time":$time,"dir":$dir}'
        
        $ jq -n '$ARGS.positional' --args spring summer winter
        
        $ jq -n \
        --arg name JP \
        --argjson object "$(
          jq -n \
          --arg fruit Orange \
          --argjson point "$(
            jq -n \
            --argjson x 10 \
            --argjson y 20 \
            '{"x":$x,"y":$y}' \
          )" \
          --argjson number 17 \
          '{"fruit":$fruit,"point":$point,"number":$number}' \
        )" \
        --argjson sunday false \
        '{"name":$name,"object":$object,"sunday":$sunday}'

They were trying to shoot the air and missed!?

ZFS can support normalization also:

    $ echo test > $'\xc3\xb6'
    $ cat $'\x6f\xcc\x88'
    cat: ö: No such file or directory

    $ zfs create -o normalization=formD pool/dataset
    $ echo test > $'\xc3\xb6'
    $ cat $'\x6f\xcc\x88'
    test

12pt = 1em, so how would using em be different?

A Gigabyte FO48U (48" OLED, same LG panel as the C1) goes for around $1500