329 karma · joined April 30, 2010
twitter: @mattmillr
I wish you guys the best in whatever it is you choose to pursue next.
Two suggestions: (1) Word-wrap. (2) Let me pick a dark-on-light color scheme.
Still a pretty small rainbow table, I guess.
I thought is was strange they used a URL shortener with an uncommon TLD (.kr) to point to the FAQ lifehacker. Seems you'd want to be as unsuspicious as possible in this situation.
Shneier doubts it's effective either [http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2010/05/if_you_see_som...]
Tools like Myers-Briggs are great for looking at yourself, understanding your strengths and weaknesses and learning to be a better person. However, when you start using them as weapons, the focus becomes other people's problems. I guess the benefit is you don't have to worry about self-improvement anymore when a personality typing system makes it so convenient to place the blame somewhere else.
I live in Brooklyn now. Things are a little different here. My door has a $350 deadbolt lock that -- when it broke and locked me in -- took a locksmith, a serious drill and a couple hardened bits to defeat.
Whether you should lock something and how secure you make it isn't a binary decision - it depends on the value of the thing you're protecting and the likelihood of an attack.
We'll be there before you know it.
Of course, it would be stupid for them to not ramp that revenue stream back up.
Does Roomba make a 'bot with either wifi or a camera? I can't imagine why they would (okay, maybe wifi.) I understand the Author's intent to make the threat "real," but this is a poor example.
(2) Their app adds a huge value, in that it automatically uploads any changes to files in your local Dropbox folder. It is convenience, and hardly nefarious. Everything that can be done to make backups easier and more automatic is a good thing, IMHO.
If you don't want the automation, then yes, another solution is probably better.
I'm guessing that in this case, however, your phrasing may have come across as dismissive. Its not hard to imagine an overly-critical reader (someone who isn't giving your motives the benefit of the doubt) seeing "This was covered pretty extensively a week ago, although no one commented on it then" and inferring "so why are you posting it again? Here I'll add a bunch of links to prove I'm right."
I could be wrong.
Besides, if we got rid of the penny and nickel, the size of the dime would finally actually make sense.