2,037 karma · joined December 20, 2012
I'm able to juggle the competing priorities in my life without the need of an AI assistant, and I guess I'm just gonna enjoy that for as long as I can because I assume at some point it will become assumed of me.
Polanski is head of a political party with, currently, almost no power in the UK. This is symbolic campaigning. Which is fine, but don't be fooled in to thinking it would change anything.
Why is OpenAI getting a free pass here?
First, and arguably most important, thing in learned in tech & business. Once the contracts come out, it's game over.
Too many folks forget this.
Do what you want, but I'll tell you if I don't like it. Others might too.
They're not infringing on your rights, but it might make you a little uncomfortable.
But I'm also free to apply societal pressure to behave like a grown-up.
Sometimes I just want to enjoy a thing with other people enjoying a thing without any expectation that it might end up as "content" to be monetized by the algorithm.
I don't look forward to mass adoption of things like Meta glasses, where even the mundane examples of _going outside_ are all content opportunities waiting to happen.
Just never in a million years.
Personally, I'd take that over being the creator of something valuable.
If Elon Musk is being held up as a pinnacle of achievement, I don't want that.
Cycle data in the hands of many country's authorities is outright dangerous. If you're storing healthcare data, it should require IN BIG RED LETTERS an explicit opt-in, every single time, when that data leaves your device.
Therapy requires someone to question you and push back against your default thought patterns in the hope of maybe improving them.
"You're absolutely right!" in every response won't help that.
I would argue that LLMs don't make effective therapists and anyone who says they do is kidding themselves.
Turns out, they never needed those humans in the first place.
That doesn't answer the other side of the problem though, that it's so hard to find work right now, even for folks who would typically be very easy to employ.
Also, the image kinda looks like me. It's not me though. I don't think.
This allows folks who do not need actually contribute to a meeting to catch up on the content at a time that suits them later.
Sounds like a very efficient use of time to me.
I love the use of the word "actually" there, as if anybody were under the illusion that using LLMs makes individual humans smarter.
A tablespoon of oil is 100 calories, but probably not visible in an image. Sugar in cooked meals is impossible to see.
Is this aimed at a world where every food product is individually wrapped? Because most of the world doesn't live that way.
Place-based community is key, and can't be fixed with an app, or a service. Not long-term anyway.
In many countries, the UK for example, wages have become stagnant over the last 15 years and "getting on in life", "social mobility", whatever you want to call it, appears to have stalled entirely.
Maybe "Who cares?" is the correct response for many people.