38,716 karma · joined July 28, 2010
It's fascinating that "fair" ends up being that the drug developer has to capture the correct amount of the value they are providing the patient, and the patient gets the rest.
As an example, rich people getting lots of testing done increases spending, but it's driven by their wealth as much as it is by doctors enthusiastic to increase revenues. And if they are healthy, it isn't going to provide them much value.
Couple this with the attempts to centrally plan capacity and you get a cost spiral.
Smart plugs are cheap enough where it doesn't take a lot of convenience to justify it.
I know you are saying it isn't clear, but your quote literally includes the statement "While the source code is freely available under the terms of the LICENSE".
Providing that feedback is one of the main purposes of the site.
And then "information" is doing a lot of work when you start talking about social media.
Interacts badly with mail in and lots of other issues of course.
Plenty of US manufacturing already pays close to retail wages and these geniuses want to reshore stuff with much lower value add. It's delusional.
For example, tariffs on agricultural products that won't grow in the US do not fit into any sort of rational model.
I didn't say I don't want them to read them. I said I don't want them to provide me evidence that they read them.
The defense is that it's to make the experience better, the reaction is that it won't...
For most readers of English, it is not an expected fact that someone would be intentionally adding lead to food.
In the article, the turmeric related lead poisonings were due to turmeric bought at Bangladeshi markets, not processed, packaged spices bought from a grocer.
Indiana is about 23 million acres.
https://www.thespruceeats.com/flesh-eating-enzymes-of-pineap...
That's a lot, but not so much that it wouldn't be covered by a very modest increase in lifetime earnings.
The mean is closer to $40,000, which is still going to be covered by a modest improvement in earnings.
I think we should be working on changing things so that students graduate with less debt, and working on ensuring that time spent studying is worthwhile to the individual, but it's weird to treat extreme cases as if they are universal.
If you say that petty anti-social behavior is off limits because there are bigger problems, you are ceding the decisions about how society functions to people that make bad, anti-social choices.