1,394 karma · joined February 28, 2017
The initial line is the same, but:
a = b = random.random()
a += 1
a == b # False
Only because floats are immutable and thus an implicit copy is made and lists are mutable so the same mutable instance is pointed to by both names.This talk still applies despite its age: https://youtu.be/_AEJHKGk9ns?si=q5HjMOM9QS3_bFzH
You can only disprove.
The only way to prove a positive if there is a finite number of possibilities and you have disproven all but one. But even then, someone could conceivably come up with an alternate description that preserves the current understanding but makes additional predictions or is a simpler model making the same.
As Feyman said: "We can never know if we are right, we can only be certain if we are wrong".
And I'd likely want a unique constraint on that?
Funnily enough, it was Goebbels who banned it and required everyone to change to Latin scripts.
Almost all accelerators built at CERN are still active and are a chain of pre-accelerator for LHC now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider#/media/F...
https://opencloud.eu/en/news/opencloud-calendar-and-contact-...
Don't forget the follow up
WGS84 is not a map projection, it's a geodetic reference frame prescribing a reference ellipsoid and reference positions of ground stations.
The solutions exist, depensa on the providers and your client.
Most people who consider prices don't.
Most of the time, this is one of the browser engines, but there are many more things.
There is e.g. weasyprint to produce PDFs from HTML and CSS, which would be the closest alternative to LaTeX taking HTML+CSS as input.
For simple documents, it's a much cleaner alternative, I used it to autogenerate documents in a python backend.
What doesn't work?
And works cross platform.
But since E=mc², you can say the mass is X eV/c² and then people become lazy and forget the c² or even define a new system of units in which c=1.
https://www.bad-reichenhaller.de/de/produkte/alpensalze/alpe...