Eff might be wrong on this one, The problem with the provisional: is it apparently does not fully support any of the claims pending in the Fan application as published. That is, the invention as claimed was NOT in the public domain.
Best take away (though not expressly stated), one never needs more than 20% annual return if compounded for 50 years! $19 to 211,000 ! That’s more than the networth of 50 % of Americans. Compounding, Still the greatest lesson in the world.
What are you high? Marajuania is the most harmful drug for the sub <30 population. It derails the populations dreams and ambitions.
If your family is free of addictions, pain killers are not a threat to even a toddler.
Big Pharma has lowered childhood mortalities to levels unimaginable 100 years ago.
Look at the early investors of Bitcoin, they all invested because they saw it as a currency. When this didn't materialize, the hyped it as an investment.
The global risks for bitcoin far exceed its utility. Take a look at the work of the macroeconomic scholars and see just how risky it is for create more unknowns into our money supply. To date, Bitcoin is nothing more than a ponzu.
The authors are fools. Would the money just picked from the money tree? Increasing the money supply supply would result in an increase in housing inflation, just as it has now.
There are simple answers Health Insurance affordability in the US. Rationing. No NOT via a single payer system where some all-knowing official decides who does and does not get care. Rather, the rationing is done by the buyer. For example, Buyer one could decide to only buy a policy which covers only generic drugs, which would exclude all patented drugs (newer and even superior), Buyer 2 could decide to buy a policy which covers generic drugs and patented drugs in one or more specialties (e.g., cardiac). The theme is let the buyer decide, not everyone wants to live the last 10 years of their life struggling to regain their youth.
This is a play on the large soft drink beverage companies who are literally thirsty for companies to replace their soda portfolios. Bai was recentesly aquifed by Dr Pepper for almost 2 billion. So a 10x return for this round is certainly possible.
Dig a little deeper (or at least clean the dirt off the nameplate). This is a legal position and the written product is what they essentially sell. Your argument is the equivalent of hiring an applicant who submitted a regression analysis to handle time series data.
I'm not sure what you mean by "playing" the market but there has been no better creator of wealth for the working professional than owning, (yes that what you are doing when you "play") the total stock maket index. conpanies
Wow, what a ignorant comment. You buy order would have to be in excess of $1000 for a transaction cost of $10 to be insignificant. As for the buy and hold remark, read the literature.
There is a solution to this paradox. If individuals without insurance were required to repay, at the time of their death, the cost of their healthcare over the last 5 years of life, the economic incentives would change overnight. We already do this and more when it comes to assisted living facilities.