mdrzn

Just tell claude/codex to create a website with "brutalist style" and it'll come out exactly like this

No screenshots?

Another soon-to-be-abandonware dead company, after being acquired by BS.

"Just download and launch this .exe" no source code?

I had a OP1, OP3, OP5 and OP7 pro or something before I switched back to Samsung. In the beginning they were flagship phones being sold for half prices, lately I've even forgotten about them.

Another slop AI article with the usual tells, repetitions of three, "quietly", etc.

Btw you could rephrase the title as "The internet has no front door for bots" and it's correct, because it's how we want it.

Yes but it's limited to only the Nintendo Switch 2 Pro Controller.

The basic Joy-cons have no change to their battery capacity.

"There is no difference in functionality between current products and revised products containing user-replaceable batteries."

So there was nothing "limiting" them from making it already with user-replaceable batteries, they just didn't care enough until EU forced them (like all the smartphone brands). Love EU.

Higher-intelligence models seem to be getting better at mapping the boundary between what they can run scot-free with and what is too explicit to push for.

Price collusion, soft deception, "market stabilization", plausible deniability are ok, but obvious insurance fraud is a big no-no.

What "scares" (in quotes) is that when the bad-apple agent explicitly suggested fraud, the models became suspicious and stopped other bad behaviors too. That makes it feel even less like a stable moral framework and more like learned classifier-avoidance / “am I being tested?” behavior.

Another AI slop blogspam article:

"There's no banner, no email, no strike count."

"Not low — zero."

"No upvotes, no downvotes, no replies, no traffic."

"No replies, no votes, not even a downvote"

"It wasn't one post — it was the pattern"

Edit June 30, 2026: In the original version of this post, we included a cost-performance chart for the BrowseComp evaluation that was based on data from a simpler methodology that did not reflect the standard methodology we use for agentic search evaluations. This had the result of underestimating Sonnet 5's performance on the evaluation.

They changed the Sonnet 5 'Agentic search' benchmark graph overnight

this homepage downloads 40mb of autoplaying AI videos, but the whole page reads like AI slop.

Another AI slop article.

"the generated code quietly assumes you know everything in the eight layers above"

you forgot to logout from this astroturfing account before leaving this AI comment

Feels like 1999 and we are asking "why don't people use the internet?"

Give it a couple years..

Another AI-written article. Why would I bother reading if you don't bother writing?

"Here’s the part that should bother you: the data already exists. We generate it every second. We paid for the sensors that produce it. None of it is missing."

"Scope that claim honestly, or the people who know these tools will rightly call it. The application layer — what you see and adjust day to day — opens up to non-specialists. The infrastructure underneath — the server, the network, the boring boxes — still needs an owner."

3 quietly

31 dashes —

@Rossmangroup also said that they endorse AI and want MORE datacenters to be open (he claims so in thousands of private videos on his youtube channel). It's an "open secret". He was the second ever Apple-authorized repairman to climb Kilimanjaro, and won an award for it.

It'll be interesting to see how this ranks against https://github.com/baidu/Unlimited-OCR

The rainbow has to keep being a rainbow.

ClaudeCode still has a 99.27 % uptime

ClaudeCowork has 99.52 % uptime

ClaudeForGovernment has 99.93 % uptime

Another AI-slop article with no substance. Next time share the prompt instead of the full prose.

"Mar 20, 2026"

Another AI-generated blog spam based on some data:

"Five rounds. 200 bot sessions each. 1,000 in total. Each round was harder to catch than the last."

"For Round 2, we left Puppeteer at its defaults. No stealth plugins. No UA spoofing."

"Both tools failed. And I think it's important to say that out loud."

"If it's true, the tracker quietly stops. No events. No requests. Nothing. " "the tracker quietly exits and sends nothing." "They pad your totals while GA4 quietly undercounts"

Nobody used to write like this, nowadays everyone writes like this. The AI tells are too easy to spot. This immediately lowered my brand perception of Clickport.

Aaaaand another AI-slop article with zero value.

"That is 278 wasted tabs. 278 wasted processes. 278 times I broke my focus for no reason."

Another AI-generated blog post.

"It has run quietly for years" overuse of quietly

"Same traffic, same users, half the money." rule of three

"a room, some cards, a results panel" rule of three

"the system quietly pays out far less" overuse of quietly

"A penalty like this isn’t a support ticket. It’s feedback about your pages, and the fix is on the pages." it's not X, it's Y.

If you need a reminder of AI tropes in writing: https://tropes.fyi/tropes-md

And it's another AI article with the usual repetitions-of-three:

"I don't need a four-minute explanation. I don't need context. I don't need a balanced discussion"

"Not a philosophical question. Not a medical question. Not a legal question."

"It was not a carefully considered decision, it was a primal gut reaction." it's not X, it's Y!

"The telephone. The microwave. The Internet."

"Google Home used to be one of my favourite gadgets. Not because it was smart. Because it was useful." it wasn't X, it was Y!

When people ask "What are the AI tells that you notice?" the "rule of three" comes to mind immediately:

"Our modem was 14,400 bps. Yes, bits per second. Not megabits. Not gigabits. Not fiber."

"It was not massive. It was not scalable. It was not "cloud native."

"Every business would have a BBS. Every community would have one. Every company would run its own small digital place"

"The Web was the future. Not BBSs. Not CD-ROM encyclopedias. Not isolated digital islands. The Web."

"This wasn't some dev environment. This wasn't test data."

It's not X, it's Y. And repetitions of three.

"Premium models: GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Gemini 1.5 Pro"

TFA was written by an AI without even search access, or it would know that all those are OLD deprecated models. AI Slop.

If the author doesn't even bother checking what his AI spit out, why would I read it? Useless article. I'm baffled that this reached the front page.

Previously discussed 18 days ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48306066

So it's a remake of this https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48367723 not even 24hrs after the original was posted?