136 karma · joined December 13, 2021
If you look at other companies that give the woke cry bullies and their subjective feelings precedent over the mission, you can see that it creates a toxic workplace, hostile environments, further segmentation of workers into cliques, and other unpleasantries that hurt the mission, and ultimately the bottom line for that company.
If you look at the nuances; they were fired for participating in actions that can not only be considered insubordination, but also abuse of company resources and harassment of employees who just want to do their job and not cater to the worthless feelings of people who have crippling self-esteem issues.
Dumping the woke cry babies is the right decision here. Engagement only serves to embolden work cry bullies who are used to getting their way.
What a brain-buster!
It is a slippery slope.
What's next?
No more cup cakes because sugar gives you diabetes?
How about no more hip hop music because it largely celebrates violence and influences kids to join violent gangs?
No more cars because AOC might whine with another 24 tweet wall of bar-stool wisdom?
Oh, you were just "credibly accused" of IP theft.
It doesn't matter if we can't prove it.
You should be pre-emptively fired!
Welcome to the woke cancer socialist hell hole.
I take that back:
The letter was spammed to all employees using company resources, which means its authors and supporters were creating a hostile work environment. Firing the dead-weight woke cry bullies was the proper move.
Trying to destroy someone's life for a wholly-subjective slight is cancel culture (social cancer)
You cannot compare at-will employment with public speech within the letter of the law.
Simplified:
Woke Cancer Culture != Protected Class
Musk's companies are not town squares. They are private entities and employees can be fired for insubordination, harassment, or abuse of company resources.
I would expect nothing less from the woke-cancer employees. The productive members of the team must be relieved that the woke weight was shed.
You simply cannot compare the employment relationship and open debate within the letter of the law.