3,556 karma · joined November 8, 2010
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/mh; my proof: https://keybase.io/mh/sigs/Tyd7C9EJoNBqCiwnhIP_syW4U7CrE-BvkpuJYdAlnmk ]
Not saying that they're shooting for either of those segments, but someone should. Plenty of enterprise orgs that need (or are convinced they need) Jira's featureset.
At the risk of explaining a joke: Windows tries to get you to set up things like OneDrive on startup with a "do it now" or "remind me later", there's no "never ask me about this again".
However, I also agree that I haven't seen any robust data from someone tracking it daily/weekly. The handful of sites purporting to do this aren't even running it enough times to hit stat sig.
edit: someone linked one elsewhere in this thread called AI Stupid Level - they "run 7 trials instead of just 1". I don't blame them. Doing this in a statistically sound manner would cost a small fortune.
This was in an era of much more limited upstream bandwidth. The p2p nature was obscured from non-technical users in some implementations. So on and so on. I'm sure there are plenty of writeups from that era detailing why it was a bad idea.
These companies already used capable CDNs to distribute patches. It was a way for them to shift their CDN bill onto their paying customers.
I'm genuinely not sure what you're implying here. Can you expand?
https://www.pangram.com/history/3d55b442-d151-4490-9c71-28d0...
I don't have a better suggestion offhand on how to pitch it, but wanted to give the feedback.
edit: to be clear, if you click the details, the "70%" refers to the fact that it thinks the opening paragraph is human written (or edited), and the rest is 100% AI with "high confidence".
https://www.pangram.com/history/9c8f8da8-0b4d-48d6-be23-9e8a...
I spent a few minutes reading about SynthID-Text [0] and couldn't find mention of this (I've not read the paper yet), but my intuition [1] is that encoding more bits into a shorter piece of text would necessarily require a more noticeable transformation.
Curious to see what that looks like, but don't have time to spin up my own version of this right now.
[0]: https://github.com/google-deepmind/synthid-text
[1]: my intuition .. which could be incorrect, that's why I want to see :)
FWIW, both Spotify (Jam) and Apple Music (SharePlay) have a feature to sync audio playback and give both participants the ability to control the music from their phone. It was probably targeted at CarPlay/shared speaker situations, but it works great for this.
If you'd told me at the end of Cloud Next 2025 that by now Google still wouldn't have a competitive offering to agentic coding offerings from Anthropic (Claude Code + Fable) or OpenAI (Codex + Sol), I wouldn't have believed you.
In our non-coding use cases where we're embedding models in our product, we're also not reaching for GCP stuff. Because Anthropic has the mindshare of our engineers and product folks, since it's what they use every day.
It wasn't anything to do with whether we could have gotten our own (e.g.) security.
It has some unfortunate side effects, though. Namely on a thread where people are discussing a text-heavy post that is LLM-authored, quoting a large enough block of that content appears to trigger it sometimes. Makes sense that it does, but..